Jesús de la Peña Hernández
and making the variable change
t= 2 cosω ;
2
cos
t
ω= (2)
(1) is transformed to:
t^3 +t^2 − 2 t− 1 = 0 (3)
Equation (3) was already “fold solved” in Point 7.14.5.
It is clear that the coefficients of (3) are:
1; p = 1; q = -2; r = -1
what leads to a discriminant
∆ =
3 2 2 3
3
3
27
1
27
2 9 27
4
1
−
+
p − pq+ r q p
that is negative, i.e., to have three real solutions for (3). In consequence, there are three
different forms of simultaneous folding of point I (initial) and F (final) on axles X ́ Y ́ (fig 2).
According to (3), the vectors sequence in fig. 2 is:
I; 1; 1; -2; -1; F
Now we should explain how to configurate the direction of those vectors (fig. 2): if,
from one coefficient to the next there is no sign change, the advancing vector turns to the right;
if that change exists, it turns to the left.
Then (3) has three solutions in t, which correspond with other three solutions for cos ω
in (1); besides, t 1 t 2 t 3 are, respectively, the tangents of angles α, β, γ in fig.2:
t 1 = tg α → 2cos ω 1
t 2 = tg β → 2cos ω 2
t 3 = tg γ → 2cos ω 3
Angles ω 1 ω 2 ω 3 correspond to the heptagon vertices having distinct abscissas.
Relating (2) with fig. 2, it is
2 2 2 4
tg
2
cos 1 1
t AO AO
=
×
= = =
α
ω (4)
If the pair of heptagon upper vertices lie on AH, when we trace
7
360
ω 1 = , OR becomes
the radius of said heptagon, and it ́ll be:
OR
OA
cosω 1 = (5)
The consequence of equalising (4) and (5) is:
r = heptagon radius = OR = 4
Bringing r from O along OY ́ we obtain vertex V.
Now we can note this:
- OR measures 4 units; in fig. 2, first vector from I towards vertical Y, is taken as one
unit. - Angles α and ω 1 have a different though very close mesure. This is unimportant,
anyway: 51 , 428571
7
360
ω 1 = = and 51 , 272558
7
360
arctg 2 cos =
α= .
The above only means that radius OR is not parallel to its associated fold, although its con-
struction is perfect.