Jesús de la Peña Hernández
15 FROM THE 2nd TO THE 3rd DIMENSION
Everything seen up to now has a bidimensional treatment, though we would have to in-
corporate certain nuances to this assertion. For example: the paper itself is three-dimensional
(2.500 times thinner than the small side of a DIN A4); the added volume when folding flat; the
flattvolumelike of unit figures in Point 8.3.4; the volume shaped as a bas-relief of tessellations
(case 3, Point 12).
We shall begin with the latter type of figures to jump to the 3rd dimension. Thus, we
have in Fig. 1 a development which, when folded as indicated leads to the elastic 3D composi-
tion of Fig. 2.
Just because of that elasticity it allows delightful transformations. Let ́s see several of
them:
As a matter of fact it is very easy to pass from the 2nd to the 3rd dimension; it suffices to
indicate in 2D that a fold has to be performed not at 180º as usual, but at any other angle speci-
fied there.
This becomes clear in the transition from Fig. 7 to 8: in Fig. 7 a rectangle receives three
cuts and then its central upper part is revolved 75º about AB. Fig. 8 is, in fact, a 3D figure.
Let us profit of that to show, again in 2D, a paradoxical figure. Fig. 11 results at the end
of process 8,9,10: In Fig.7 we made three cuts, whereas in Fig. 11 there appear to be four.
1
3
4
5
6
A B
3- Plan view of a quasi-ellipse.
4- Same of a quasi-hyperbola.
5- Face AB adapts itself to the
arc of any opposed curve (cir-
cumference, parabola, etc.).
6- Quasi-toroidal section.