Mathematics and Origami
- Start in I (IO = 1) a series of coefficient vectors according to these criteria:
IO = 1: coefficient of x^2.
OA = 2: absolute value of the x coefficient; at right angle with IO; clockwise direction be-
cause from 1st to 2nd term there is no sign change.
AF = 3: absolute value of the independent term; at right angle with OA; anticlockwise di-
rection because passing from the 2nd to the 3rd term there is sign change.
Finally we get F which is the end point of the three successive vectors. - To fold
I → x ́ ; F → F
As can be seen, there are two solutions:
OX 1 = 1 ; OX 2 = -3
Justification:
∆IOX 1 ; ∆FAX 1 as well as ∆IOX 2 ; FAX 2 are similar, so:
AF
AX
OX
IO 1
1
= ;
AF
AX
OX
IO 2
2
=
To assign a value to these segments, we have to bear in mind:
- Independent variable x is to be given the correspondent sign in the Cartesian plane.
- Give to the rest of segments the absolute value they have in equation (1), because its sign
was already taken into account when clockwise or anticlockwise direction was assigned:
these segments (the equation coefficients) have not the dimension of the independent vari-
able though they appear overlapped with it in the Cartesian plane.
Then it follows:
3
1 1 2
1
+
=
x
x
;
3
1 2 2
2
− −
=
−
x
x
that in both cases leads to the same result (x 1 ; x 2 been taking by x):
x^2 + 2x – 3 = 0
Yet we ́ll see another example to settle sign attribution.
Let the quadratic equation with roots x 1 = -1; x 2 = -3
(x+1) (x+3) = 0 ; x^2 + 4x + 3 = 0 (2)
- Absolute values:
IO = 1: coefficient of x^2
OA= 4: coefficient of x
AF= 3: independent term - Vectors ́ sequence: IOAF (clockwise all the time because in (2) there is not signs change).
- Fold: I → x ́; F → F
- Roots come out to be: Ox 1 = -1; Ox 2 = -3
Similarity of ∆IOx 1 ~ ∆FAx 1 ; ∆IOx 2 ~ ∆Ax 2 F give:
AF
Ax
Ox
IO 1
1
= ;
AF
Ax
Ox
IO 2
2
=