MATHEMATICS AND ORIGAMI

(Dana P.) #1
Mathematics and Origami


  • Start in I (IO = 1) a series of coefficient vectors according to these criteria:
    IO = 1: coefficient of x^2.
    OA = 2: absolute value of the x coefficient; at right angle with IO; clockwise direction be-
    cause from 1st to 2nd term there is no sign change.
    AF = 3: absolute value of the independent term; at right angle with OA; anticlockwise di-
    rection because passing from the 2nd to the 3rd term there is sign change.
    Finally we get F which is the end point of the three successive vectors.

  • To fold
    I → x ́ ; F → F


As can be seen, there are two solutions:
OX 1 = 1 ; OX 2 = -3
Justification:
∆IOX 1 ; ∆FAX 1 as well as ∆IOX 2 ; FAX 2 are similar, so:


AF

AX
OX

IO 1
1

= ;
AF

AX
OX

IO 2
2

=

To assign a value to these segments, we have to bear in mind:



  • Independent variable x is to be given the correspondent sign in the Cartesian plane.

  • Give to the rest of segments the absolute value they have in equation (1), because its sign
    was already taken into account when clockwise or anticlockwise direction was assigned:
    these segments (the equation coefficients) have not the dimension of the independent vari-
    able though they appear overlapped with it in the Cartesian plane.


Then it follows:


3

1 1 2
1

+
=
x
x

;
3

1 2 2
2

− −
=

x
x

that in both cases leads to the same result (x 1 ; x 2 been taking by x):
x^2 + 2x – 3 = 0


Yet we ́ll see another example to settle sign attribution.
Let the quadratic equation with roots x 1 = -1; x 2 = -3
(x+1) (x+3) = 0 ; x^2 + 4x + 3 = 0 (2)



  • Absolute values:
    IO = 1: coefficient of x^2
    OA= 4: coefficient of x
    AF= 3: independent term

  • Vectors ́ sequence: IOAF (clockwise all the time because in (2) there is not signs change).

  • Fold: I → x ́; F → F

  • Roots come out to be: Ox 1 = -1; Ox 2 = -3
    Similarity of ∆IOx 1 ~ ∆FAx 1 ; ∆IOx 2 ~ ∆Ax 2 F give:


AF

Ax
Ox

IO 1
1

= ;
AF

Ax
Ox

IO 2
2

=
Free download pdf