Müller, R., & Basho, S. (2004). Are nonlinguistic functions in “Broca’s area” prerequisites for lan-
guage acquisition? FMRI findings from an ontogenetic viewpoint.Brain and Language, 89,
329–336.
Müller, R., Kleinhans, N., & Courchesne, E. (2001). Rapid communication: Broca’s area and the
discrimination of frequency transitions: A functional MRI study.Brain and Language, 76,
70–76.
National Center for Education Statistics. (1993).Literacy from 1870 to 1979: Educational charac-
teristics of the population. Retrieved December 24, 2003, from http://nces.ed.gov/naal/
historicaldata/edchar.asp.
National Commission of Excellence in Education. (1983).A nation at risk: The imperative for ed-
ucational reform. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
Nelson, K. (1973). Structure and strategy in learning to talk.Monographs of the Society for Re-
search in Child Development, 38(1–2, Serial No. 149).
Newmeyer, F. (1998). On the supposed “counterfunctionality” of universal grammar: Some evolu-
tionary implications. In J. Hurford, M. Studdert-Kennedy, & C. Knight (Eds.),Approaches to
the evolution of language(pp. 305–319). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Newport, E., Gleitman, H., & Gleitman, E. (1977). Mother, I’d rather do it myself: Some effects
and non-effects of maternal speech style. In C. Snow & C. Ferguson (Eds.),Talking to chil-
dren: Language input and acquisition(pp. 109–150). Cambridge, England: Cambridge Uni-
versity Press.
Noden, H. (1999).Image grammar: Using grammatical structures to teach writing.Portsmouth,
NH: Heinemann.
Odell, L., Vacca, R., Hobbs, R., & Irvin, J. (2001).Elements of language: Introductory course.
Austin, TX: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Ojemann, G. A. (1983). Brain organization for language from the perspective of electrical stimula-
tion mapping.Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 2,189–207.
Orfield, G. (2004).Still separate after all these years: An interview with Professor Gary Orfield.
Retrieved June 11, 2004, from http://www.gse.harvard.edu/news/ features/orfield05012004.
html.
Orr, E. (1987).Twice as less. New York: Norton.
Paradis, M. (1999, August).Neuroimaging studies of the bilingual brain: Some words of caution.
Paper presented at the 25th Lacus Forum, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
Patterson, N. (2001). Just the facts: Research and theory about grammar instruction. In J.
Hagemann (Ed.),Teaching grammar: A reader and workbook(pp. 31–37). Boston: Allyn &
Bacon.
Peck, M. (1982).An investigation of tenth-grade students’writing. Washington, DC: United Press
of America.
Pedersen, E. (1978). Improving syntactic and semantic fluency in writing of language arts stu-
dents through extended practice in sentence-combining.Dissertation Abstracts International,
38 , 5892-A.
Perani, D., Paulesu, E., Galles, N., Dupoux, E., Dehaene, S., Bettinardi, V., Cappa, S., Fazio, F., &
Mehler, J. (1998). The bilingual brain: Proficiency and age of acquisition of the second lan-
guage.Brain, 121,1841–1852.
Perron, J. (1977).The impact of mode on written syntactic complexity. Athens, GA: University of
Geogia Studies in Language Education Series.
Petrosky, A. (1990). Rural poverty and literacy in the Mississippi Delta: Dilemmas, paradoxes,
and conundrums. In A. Lunsford, H. Moglen, & J. Slevin (Eds.),The right to literacy(pp.
61–73). New York: Modern Language Association.
Pinker, S. (1994).The language instinct: How the mind creates language. New York: Morrow.
Pinker, S. (1995). Language acquisition. In L. Gleitman & M. Liberman (Eds.),Language: An in-
vitation to cognitive science(pp. 135–182). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Pinker, S. (1999).Words and rules.New York: Basic Books.
Pinker, S. (2002).The blank slate: The modern denial of human nature. New York: Viking.
REFERENCES 261