The Sunday Times - UK (2021-11-14)

(Antfer) #1

The Sunday Times November 14, 2021 27


NEWS REVIEW


BATHTIME WARS


but as there was so much extra work,
women did, too. “There were 49 hours of
additional childcare per household,” says
Sally Howard, the author of The Home
Stretch: Why the Gender Revolution
Stalled at the Kitchen Sink. “But there was
a proportional carry-over, so women did
60 per cent more.”
All chores are not alike, she adds. “The
tasks that men took on tended to be the
higher value, enjoyable kind. They’d be
cooking a showy banquet, rather than
everyday drudgery like cleaning the bog.
But men are also being pressured more to
return to the office and that will skew
things at home, because women are
more likely to be at home and physically
there to do the work.”
Those who do not have children may
not be familiar with the unique longueur
between the end of the nursery or school
day and bedtime. As a freelance writer
who tends to be at home then, it often
falls to me to take care of our child. It is no
coincidence that this part of the day coin-
cided with what fathers once called “a
quick half with the guys from the office”.
Working from home ought to have
evened out the chores but the evidence
suggests otherwise.
“It really hasn’t changed much,” says
Caroline Whaley, the co-founder of
Shine, which supports working women.
“Women are still picking up 70 per cent of
the chores at home. A lot of women told
us their husbands had just comman-
deered the spare room, and could go in
and shut the door, while they were work-
ing at the dining room table.”
As well as the dishes and laundry and
cooking and childcare, women have
taken on extra emotional labour. “It has
been overwhelming,” Whaley says.
“Whether it’s family stuff, or carrying
responsibility for their teams at work, it
has all contributed to a drain on women’s
lives. There is more burnout than we
have ever seen before.
“Young mothers never feel they have
enough ‘me time’ anyway but that disap-
peared completely. A knock-on effect of
that is a feeling of a lack of accomplish-
ment, looking at your life and thinking, ‘is
this really it?’”
“There is a definite blurring of bound-
aries, which can affect people’s mental
health,” says Claire McCartney, a policy
adviser for the Chartered Institute of Per-
sonnel and Development, a professional
body for HR managers.
“[People working from home] are less
likely to take breaks and focus on wellbe-
ing. Our advice to companies and line
managers is to check in regularly.”
She also points out that two-parent,
white-collar set-ups are only part of the
story. “Forty-four per cent of employees
can’t work from home because of the
nature of their work,” she says. “So we
feel there is less flexibility being afforded
to them, which is quite unequal.”
There is evidence that it is human
nature to think you are doing too much.
In his book Thinking Fast and Slow, the
Nobel prize-winning behavioural psy-
chologist Daniel Kahneman writes that in
shared flats everyone ought to feel like
they are doing more than their fair share
of chores. We instinctively give more
weight to our own labour.
For families feeling the strain, Whaley
advises an old-fashioned solution: a con-
versation. “Women ought to realise that
it’s fine not to always be the one at the
school gates. It’s fine for the kid to wear a
funny outfit or have a burger once in a
while. Life isn’t going to fall apart.
“But by far the most helpful thing to do
is delineate roles. Sit down and ask each
other: ‘What’s fair here?’ It’s not an easy
conversation but it’s important, because
otherwise it can breed resentment like
nobody’s business. Just don’t have that
conversation when you’re angry.”
For Tom, the pandemic has given him
a new perspective on domestic labour. “I
have a much greater first-hand experi-
ence of the challenges but also the beauty
in the mundane, repetitive tasks at home.
It’s very demanding, raising a child.”
In other words, whoever is in charge of
the bathwater, don’t throw out the baby.

NEWS REVIEW


‘I


t was like being in a pressure
cooker,” says James, remem-
bering the early days of the
pandemic. In March last year
he and his wife, Sophie,
found themselves locked
down at home with their
children, aged five and two.
Both parents work at law
firms, which suddenly had to
be combined with home schooling, child-
care and more housework than usual.
“It was quite exciting at first, even fun,
being at home with my wife and the kids,”
says James. “But it could be extremely
stressful too. The only way we could do
any work was to work in one or two-hour
shifts. By six or seven the house would be
a bomb site, so we would have to tidy, and
then after the kids went to bed we would
catch up on the hours of work we had
missed during the day.”
While it was occasionally fraught,
there were benefits. Sixty-five per cent of
fathers reported a better relationship
with their children after the first lock-
down. Fatherhood support groups had a
surge in membership.
Now the world is returning to normal,
the lines between professional and
domestic life are still blurred. “It’s an
endless debate with my wife and people
at work,” says James. “What’s best?”
The simultaneous pull of home and
work will be familiar to many. After the
chaos of the past 20 months, couples —
and especially parents — are emerging
blinking into a new world where the old
work-life settlement has been destroyed
but it is not yet clear what will replace it
and who will do what and when.
Deep down lurks the suspicion that
legging it to the office is the easy option
compared with staying home to hold — or
even just help to hold — the baby.
As one female friend puts it to me:
“There are no firebreaks any more.”
Work and parenting now coexist in a
swirling, overlapping mass of Zooms,
emails and chores. It might be more effi-
cient to unload the dishwasher at the
same time as arguing with your boss, but
it is exhausting.
“It has reshaped the norms of what’s
expected in family life and what’s appro-
priate,” says Tom, who works for Google
and has emerged from the pandemic
with three children under three. “It’s sub-
tle, but there are new expectations
[around childcare] and you can’t just
shed them because the world has gone
back to normal. You can hear the chil-
dren screaming and you can’t not go and
help, but equally work expectations have
moved on faster than you can adjust to
the new mores.”
In the UK, the number of people work-
ing from home doubled over the pan-
demic, according to the Office for
National Statistics. The new status quo
exerts unfamiliar pressures on many rela-
tionships. Studies have shown that 69 per

be a good thing, there is a hidden down-
side. On Friday, the economist Catherine
Mann, who sits on the Bank of England’s
monetary policy committee, was quoted
on the front page of The Times warning of
the potential for “two tracks”, one vir-
tual, one physical. Staying at home, she
warned, could hurt women’s careers.
“[Lockdown] has been really, really
stressful for families,” says Alivia Rose, a
psychotherapist and spokesperson for
the UK Council for Psychotherapy. Coun-
sellors, therapists and support groups
have recorded a surge of interest during
lockdown. “Some couples have grown
closer, but it has broken up many marria-
ges and relationships.”
New rules have been hard on children
too, she says. “If parents are working at
home and say ‘Right, mum or dad is
working now, we can’t talk to you,’ it’s
hard for children to get that definition.”
The statistics show that men picked up
more domestic duties during lockdown,

cent of women want to work from home
at least one day a week, compared with
56 per cent of fathers. For all its progres-
sive promise, the post-pandemic work-
life balance can be a mess of guilt, recrim-
inations and anxiety in which women still
pick up most of the slack.
My wife gave birth to our daughter a
fortnight before the first lockdown. It was
a good time to have a baby. While all
Lara’s colleagues were working from
home — she has a staff job on a magazine
— it was easier for her to join meetings by
video. When the rules permitted, how-
ever, she couldn’t get back to the office
full time fast enough. Nothing personal,
she explained over her shoulder. I sym-
pathised. The Victorian two-up, two-
down we live in is not really cut out to
double as a shared workspace.
For women, in particular, working
from home may be professionally risky.
While on the face of it reduced commut-
ing time and greater flexibility ought to

Couples, and parents in particular, have got used to


having one another around to help out. But as offices call


people back to their desks, tense negotiations are taking


place —including in Ed Cumming’s house


supermarket skip of choice,
then? I quite like shopping at
Waitrose”; and scolded a
guest for weeping when he
met the paramedics who had
saved his life: “Stop crying.
This is supposed to make you
happy. Anyway, after the
break, the biggest dog in the
UK. And he really is big. Don’t
miss it!”
It’s low-level gaffes such as
these that have made him a
figure of fun for, among
others, David Waywell, who
created a fake blog called the
Richard Madeley
Appreciation Society in 2007
after finishing his PhD in
English literature.
“He attracted my attention
because he was the perfect
everyman for the world of
celebrity: a mixture of overly
confident incompetence and
tone-deaf sensibilities,
especially around Judy
[Finnigan, his wife and
former co-presenter],”
Waywell explains.

R


ichard Madeley has just
been confirmed as Piers
Morgan’s replacement
on Good Morning
Britain — in a £300,000
deal. Next Sunday you’ll see
him enter the “jungle” —
actually a Covid-secure castle
in Wales — as a contestant on
I’m a Celebrity... Get Me Out
of Here! for a rumoured
£200,000 fee. Last week he
provoked more than 1,400
complaints via Ofcom after he
ripped up an antivax leaflet
live on TV. This would be a
chaotic few weeks for any
other presenter; for Madeley
it seems par for the course.
The 65-year-old is
frequently described as the
real-life Alan Partridge. He is
a man who has spoken on air
about taking his own salt into
restaurants; wondered about
vets’ bills (“Is there a point
where you just say, ‘Too
expensive — the dog has to
die’?”); asked guests who take
food from skips, “What’s your

Madeley’s memoir is
unflinching in its description
of his troubled family. His
grandfather Geoffrey was
effectively sold to his uncle to
work as a farm labourer in
exchange for tickets to
Canada for the rest of the
family. The resulting
unhappiness passed down a
generation, and Madeley’s
father was often violent.
Madeley was born in
Romford and went to school
in Bow. After leaving at 16, he
took a trainee job on the
Brentwood Argus in Essex.
His first broadcasting gig was
on local radio in Carlisle in
1976, and he worked his way
through regional TV news
until he reached Granada
Reports in 1982, where he met
Finnigan. She was assigned to
mentor him on his first day. “I
thought he looked nice, but
the suit was a bit flash,” she
later recalled. She was 34;
Madeley was 26.
They divorced their
partners, married in 1986 and
had their son, Jack, who now
does their PR, and their
daughter, Chloe, soon
afterwards (Finnigan already
had twin boys). They ended
up presenting This Morning

on ITV together in 1988. The
show’s success generated
copious gossip, including one
tabloid headline that
Finnigan was an alcoholic
and Madeley a violent drunk.
“We’d gone away for a
week to Cornwall with our
children, and the mobile
went in the car,” said
Madeley. “It was our bosses at
Granada saying a terrible
rumour was being put around
that you’re in a self-help
institution for men who
batter their wives because
you’ve beaten Judy, that
Judy’s in a drying-out clinic
and the children are in care.
We were in the f***ing car!”
Herring says Madeley’s
loyalty to his wife has never
faltered. “He’s very open and
straight-talking in dealing
with the media, and as a
husband and a dad he’s a
genuinely lovely man,” he
says. “When the press has
been out there taking
potshots at Judy, he’s always
stood by her.” Finnigan
retired from TV work in 2018.
But the gaffes, and his
ability to land on his feet after
them, are for many the
source of his appeal. A quick
internet search of his name

brings up apologies for
calling an Insulate Britain
campaigner “darling” on air,
jokes about him calling Rishi
Sunak “Ricky” and a
conversation about eyeliner
with Queen’s new frontman,
Adam Lambert. He’s been
acquitted of a shoplifting
charge, delivered a bizarre
impersonation of Ali G on air
and struggled to cover
Finnigan’s accidentally
exposed bosom on live TV.
For the comedian Richard
Herring, who starred with
Stewart Lee in the spoof BBC
show This Morning with
Richard Not Judy, he is as
close to a national institution
as TV has. “We avoided work
by watching their show
throughout the 1990s, so it
was a tribute rather than a
parody,” he says.
They appeared on the real
This Morning a few times and
always chatted to Richard in
the green room. “What I
particularly liked about him
off screen was that he swore
like a trooper,” Herring
recalls. “Without Judy to
temper and control him he’s
even more of a dangerous
force of nature, and I utterly
adore him for it.”

Never mind the gaffes, Richard Madeley is a national treasure


Clockwise from
top: Richard
Madeley with his
wife Judy
Finnigan in
the 1980s;
as Ali G on
This Morning in
2000; walking in
London last year

Madeley accepts the
brickbats philosophically. “I
suppose I do have a bit of
Partridge about me, but
there’s a bit of Partridge in
every journalist on the
planet,” he told one local
newspaper. When asked by
The Bookseller magazine if
his family memoir Fathers &
Sons would change public
perceptions of him, he was
blithely dismissive. “I don’t
give a tuppenny f***. The key
thing is to have no sense of
self-importance: it’s
ridiculous to be self-
important. I just do the best I
can and hope most people
take me on my merits.”
“He’s not just an Autocue
monkey,” says James
Herring, who oversaw
publicity for Richard &
Judy, the couple’s
Channel 4 teatime show,
and their successful book
club. “He has the sharp
mind of a journalist and
years of training, so he’s
always had this ability to
drop in a zinger of a
question. He brings a
weapons-grade quality
to interviews and items
that simply cannot be
faked.”

The daytime TV legend has replaced


Piers Morgan and is a favourite to win


I’m a Celebrity. It’s the career high he


deserves, says Stephen Armstrong


TV TIMES/FUTURE PUBLISHING/GETTY IMAGES
Free download pdf