Download free eBooks at bookboon.com
Marketing Communications
Personified Promotion
EVALUATION OF SALES FORCE PERFORMANCE
• The task of managing a sales force should include the job of evaluating the efforts of the
sales people. Until executives know what their sales force is doing, they are not in a position
to make constructive proposals for improvement. Performance evaluation is essential for
various reasons.
• Performance analysis can assist sales manager in improving efforts or contributions from
individual salesperson.
• Performance evaluation can aid in determining training programme content, sales force
supervision and pin-pointing specific strengths and weaknesses of the sales force.
• Performance evaluation can assist management to decide compensation packages and
promotion for the sales force.
• Performance evaluation should be based on quantitative and qualitative factors.
QUANTITATIVE BASES: sales performance should be evaluated on the basis of input or efforts such
as indicated by call rate, non-selling activities, product demonstration and so on. It should be evaluated
on the basis of output result as measured by achieved sales volume, gross margin, and so on.
Some output-result factors that ordinarily are quite useful as evaluation bases are:
- Sales volume – by products, customer groups territory and so on.
- Sales volume as a percentage of quota or territorial potential.
- Gross margin by product line, customer group and so on.
- Orders – number, average size in monetary terms, batting average or orders divided by calls.
- Accounts – percentage of accounts sold, number of new accounts called on and sold.
Some useful input – effort factors to measure are:
- Calls per day or call rate
- Direct selling expense, as a percentage of sales volume or expense quota.
- Non selling activities such advertising displays set up and number of training sessions held
with dealer and distributors.
A successful evaluation programme should appraise the sales person’s performance on as many different
bases as possible to avoid a misleading evaluation. For example, a high daily call rate appears good, but
it tells the management nothing about how many orders per call are being written up.