dihydroxynaphthalene (Fig. 4.35). Degradation then proceeds as shown for
naphthalene (Fig. 4.34).
At the Burlington Northern site the creosote-contaminated soil was sieved and
then ball milled to reduce particle size, a process that increases contaminant avail-
ability by increasing reactive surface area. The milled creosote-contaminated soil
was then slurried with water and placed in five separate (to allow comparisons)
64-litre stainless steel bioreactors, equipped with aeration, agitation and temper-
ature controls. An inoculum of PAH-degrading bacteria was then added, along
with an inorganic supplement, containing nitrogen as NH 4 , potassium,
magnesium, calcium and iron. Conditions within the reactors were controlled to
optimize degradation for 12 weeks.
Average initial concentrations in the PAH-contaminated soil and the residual
concentrations after 12 weeks in the bioreactor are shown in Table 4.12. Although
degradation was clearly greater for the lighter PAHs (98%) it was still extensive
for the heavier compounds (70%). Furthermore, these extents of degradation
were consistently achieved in the five replicated systems. Thus, while the use of
bioreactors is technically more demanding, and more expensive, biodegradation
is extensive and reliable.
4.10.4 Phytoremediation
Phytoremediation is the use of plants and trees to clean up metals, pesticides,
solvents, explosive hydrocarbons, PAHs and leachates at contaminated sites.
The Chemistry of Continental Solids 137
Naphthalene
OH Ring cleavage
OH
1,2-Dihydroxynaphthalene
HOOC OH
O
HOOC O
OH
HOOC O
OH
OH
Side-chain
Pyruvic acid removal
HOOC O
CH 3
C
Ring cleavagesee Fig. 4.33 Salicylic acid
OH
COOH
OH
OH
Catechol Salicylic aldehyde
OH
CHO
Fig. 4.34Biodegradation pathways for naphthalene.