(^)
- JH Well, wait. TDialoghe m^ ug doesn't matter, Coding^ Comments^
becausomething inse that's where ou equation 3] r origin is. [erases C Claim119. that answers the challenge in^ - L122. KP NJ No it [orio, it's [origin] ain't. gin] at the angle []. AC Ch Challenges 120. Alternate Claim to 120.
- JH123B. L WhP Itere do w [?] would be te put ouimes onr origin? Oh, Oe. K RQCl Cl RQCl = RCryptic equest for Clarification
- JH124. KJ Y Sure neah. ow? Sp Ck Sp = SCk = Cupportonsensus Check^ ing.
- KJ Yeah Sp
Table 4-15. Group 4B, Episode 17, lines 120-126.
In a second example, Group 5B (Table 4-16) continually confuses the relationship
between gravitational potential energy, kinetic energy, and escape velocity (See
Appendix B for a statement of Problem 5). Group member KE wanted the velocity of the
space probe to be zero when it reaches its designated altitude. Group member MC
disagreed with him (line 42) and the challenge causes him to modify his original claim.
But his Modified Claim is also in error, and member MC continues to correct the error.
Eventually he sees the problem and changes his mind.
(^) Dialog Coding Comments
- KE Kilomthat fast when it's lauetersnched. Rig per seconht when it's d. If it's going
free ozero. So it'f our gll jravitatioust leavnal pe. ull, it'll be going
C have zeroHis Claim velocity is that th when it ache space probe will ieves
its designated altitude.- MCprobe] is OK, s going to leavo but...I done [i.e., es't thcape], isink this [space it? AC MC41. disagrees the idea expressed in
- KE So thgoes to zero. en, actually kinetic energy MC Modifies Claim in 41.
- Mto zero]. C I don't think [the kinetic energy goes Ch
- KE T[space probe] whis [vill still helocityave kinetic en] isn't [zero], soerg thy. is AC This is anoriginal Claim Altern. ate Claim to his
- KE Oh46. MC OK. , perfect. Ak Ak MC AcknoHe acceptswledges hi the support ins ne 46. w claim.
(^) Table 4-16. Group 5B, Episode 6, Lines 41-47.