40
ANTIQUITY OF HINDU
CRAFT
TRADITIONS
conception
of
law and order
than that which
they
seek to
establish.
The Manasira, as summarised by
Rim Raz,
contains
several
directions
regarding theplacingof
village
shrines, but
the
question arisesas to
whether it is permissible
to
assume
thatthispartofHindu craft-tradition
isasancient
astheBud-
dhistsculptures ofBharhutand
Sanchi. Rim Riz
infersthat
itcannot be, because among these directions
aresome
which
place
"
theobjectsworshippedbyJainasand
Bauddhas"
outside
the village. But I venture to think that he
is mistaken
in
assumingthat
there
isanysectariancontemptor
disparagement
implied in this passage.
Itsimply records the
fact that the
principalobjectof
veneration for
Jains
and
Buddhistswasthe
stdpa which originally belonged
to the cremation
or burial
ground,outsidethe
villagepale. Theprovision made
for
Jain
and Buddhistworship in
this Silpa-sastra, and the
fact that
shrinesofDurgiareplacedin the
same category,are
sufficient
proof thatthereis
no
sectarianfeeling intheinjunction.
One of Fergusson's most fatal errors was his conclusion
thatthesymbolismofBuddhistartwasmoreancientthan
that
oforthodoxBrahmanism,insteadofbeing,asweshall
presently
see, entirely derived from it. Brahmi, Vishnu, and Siva
are
philosophical concepts which have their root in the
earliest
religiousideasoftheAryan race, andtheblunderofdatingthe
historyofHindutemplesfromabouttheseventh centurya.d.,^
insteadof
from
theearliestoriginsof Indianreligiousbuilding,
has putarchaeologicalresearchonthewrongtrackeversinceit
wasacceptedasatruismon Fergusson's authority.
Primdfacie,itiswhollyimprobablethatthephilosophical
speculationsconnectedwith the three positions
of the sun
in
the heavenswhich arefundamentaltoallIndo-Aryan religious
belief
shouldhave
remainedwithoutconcrete
artisticsymbols
^
Fergusson,vol.ii.
p.89.