ANTIQUITY OF
HINDU CRAFT
TRADITIONS
41
for so many
centuries. The fact that
the earliest have not
hitherto
been discovered is
only an instance of how a false
premiss mayobscure
the mentalvision of experts
;
but
when
thefine
workoftheIndianmaster-builderinthe
nineteenthand
twentieth
centuries has entirely
escaped the notice of Anglo-
Indians,itisnaturaltoexpect
that theyshouldoftenlosetheir
wayinmoreremotefields of
observation.
"
Noone,"
saysFergusson,
"
canaccusethe pureAryans
ofbuildingtemplesatall, orofworshippingimagesofSivaor
Vishnu."
'
He ignoressuchpassages in the Mahabharata as
that
inBhishmaVadhaParva,
sect,
cxiii.":
"
Theidols of the
Kuru
Kingin his
templestrembleand
danceand
weep."
The
Saivism andVaishnavism which run through the whole of
the
Hindu epics Fergusson treats as modern corruptions of
the
"
pure
Aryanfaith
"
asexpounded
intheVedas,andexplains
awaythe evidencewhichconflicts
withhisstatementsas falsi-
fications
of the Hindu sacredtextsmadeby
thewilyBrahman
of medieval
times. But the architectural
theories which he
brought forwardasevidence
breakdownatevery
pointonclose
examination. I hold no brief for
Hindu theologians.
All
schoolsoftheology
writehistoryfroma
theological
ratherthan
ascientific standpoint; but
when one considers
how Hindu
religious
traditionswere handed
downfromone
generation to
another, the
probabilitiesofany
extensive
deliberate falsifica-
tion seem to be very
remote. It is
easyto falsifya
written
statement of
which only a few
copies are
made, but
that a
nationaloraltradition,
theprecision
ofwhich
wasscientifically
maintained bya most
elaborate
mnemonic system
in which
everywordand
syllablewas
counted,couldbe
deliberately
falsi-
fied bya few
unscrupulous
priests
is less
credible than the
assumption that
amateur
archaeologists
sometimesmake
fatal
mistakes.
J "
IndianArchitecture
"
(revisededition),
vol.i.
p.42-
^ Roy's
translation.