VISHNU
SHRINES
43
thatthe"Vishnu
"
shrineisas ancientas
anyother
—viz. that
miniature shrines
of thistypeare
constantlybeing
dug up at
Sarnath and otherancient
Buddhist sites,
side by side with
the miniature stdpas which
were the special
symbols of the
Buddhistsand
Jains. Forreasonswhich
aregivenbelowitis
necessaryto reject Professor Macdonell's
theory' of the
deri-
vation of the sikhara from the stdpa,
to which
I subscribed
previously.^ Theconstructive
principlewasthesame
in both,
butthe symbolismofthe stdpawasdifferent.
The mostnoteworthyexampleofa
"
Vishnu
"
shrine,and
oneoftheearliestnowexisting,isthe
famousBuddhisttemple
of
Bodh-Gayi, built
in honour of the Bodhi tree (Vishnu's
tree),andof Buddha as the Upholderofthe Universe. Not
many years ago the possession of the shrinewas thesubject
of
a great controversy in which the
Government of Bengal
opposed the
claimsofthe Mahantofa neighbouringVaishna-
vaite monastery to its custody.
The official
experts seem to
havemisapprehended the historicalaspectsofthecase,and,as
so
frequentlyhappenswhen historyismisread,ledtheGovern-
mentintoafalse
positionwithregardtothereligioustraditions
ofIndia.
As
a
"
Vishnu
"
shrinemaybeBuddhist,so
itmayalsobe
Saivaite, for
Siva to Saivaites is Brahmi,
Vishnu, and Siva.
Itistheimage forwhich
theshrine is builtwhichdetermines
theform
of
thelatter. There
is some internal evidence as to
the
antiquityof
the M^nasara traditions
in this statement, for
image-worshipwas not
generally recognised by
philosophical
Hinduism until theriseofthe
Mahayanaschool of
Buddhism
about the beginning
of the Christian
era. But
shrines for
Brahmi,Vishnu,and
Sivawerecertainlybuilt
beforethistime.
/
A
"
Siva
"
shrine,inthe
technical sense,has
one entrance
^
"JournaloftheRoyal
SocietyofArts,"Mar.
5,1909.
2
"
Indian
Architecture: ItsPsychology,
Structure,andHistory,"
1913,
p.98.