The New Yorker - USA (2021-11-29)

(Antfer) #1

©^2


02


0 K


EN


DA


L


Connecting
generations.

1.800.548.9469


kao.kendal.org/intergenerational

EQUAL HOUSINGOPPORTUNITY


Experience a retirement community
that’s bringing generations together
—engaging at every age and stage.

THE NEWYORKER, NOVEMBER 29, 2021 87


than comic-book thought bubble.” Ob-
sessed with notions of masculinity and
chivalry, Ambrose indulges in “a fan-
tasy that American soldiers somehow
preserved a boyish innocence amid the
slaughter,” she writes. If anything, the
boyish innocence may belong to Am-
brose himself, who admits that he grew
up venerating veterans of the Second
World War, a youthful hero worship
that, Samet notes, “tends to overwhelm
the historian’s mandate.”
For a more accurate account, Samet
highlights a multivolume study, “The
American Soldier,” by the sociologist
Samuel Stouffer and a team of collab-
orators. During the war, they studied
the ideological motives of American
troops, and concluded that, “beyond
acceptance of the war as a necessity
forced upon the United States by an
aggressor, there was little support of at-
tempts to give the war meaning in terms
of principles and causes.” Samet finds
this real-time depiction of a nonideo-
logical American soldier to be credi-
ble. In the words of the military sociol-
ogist Charles C. Moskos, who studied
the motivations of soldiers in the Sec-
ond World War and in Vietnam, each
man fights a “very private war... for
his own survival.” Or, as John Hersey
put it in a later foreword to “Into the
Valley,” his narrative of U.S. marines
battling on Guadalcanal, the soldiers
fought “to get the damn thing over and
go home.”
Samet argues that Steven Spielberg’s
blockbuster movie “Saving Private
Ryan,” from 1998, is “wholly unrepre-
sentative” of Second World War atti-
tudes toward the individual soldier. She
contrasts the 1949 film “Twelve O’Clock
High,” in which a brigadier general
(played by Gregory Peck) insists that
his men place collective loyalties above
personal ones. After one pilot breaks
formation, during a sortie over Nazi
Europe, in order to assist a fellow-aviator
at risk of being shot down, Peck lashes
out, “You violated group integrity....
The one thing which is never expend-
able is your obligation to this group. . . .
That has to be your loyalty—your only
reason for being.” By focussing on the
fate of a single survivor, Samet writes,
Spielberg’s film “effectively transforms
the conflict from one characterized by
mass mobilization and modern indus-


trial warfare to something more old-
fashioned, recalling the heroism of an-
cient epics,” in which individual glories
and tragedies take narrative precedence
over the wider war.
Samet is particularly harsh on Tom
Brokaw’s “The Greatest Generation,”
also from 1998, with its “explicitly mes-
sianic agenda” of showing us a cohort
so packed with honor and honesty and
self-sacrifice that it was, as the news-
man writes, “birthmarked for greatness.”
In a section titled “Shame,” Brokaw ac-
knowledges the racism that was so “per-
vasive in practice and in policy” in this
greatest of eras, but he responds with
uplifting sketches of members of racial
minorities who manage to overcome it.
(“It is my country, right or wrong,” one
of them concludes. “None of us can ever
contribute enough.”) Samet dissents,
stressing, for instance, that the conflict
in the Pacific, “begun in revenge and
complicated by bitter racism” against
the Japanese, has been overshadowed
by the less morally troubling sagas of
European liberation.
“Unity must always prevail,” Samet
writes of the war myths. “Public opinion
must turn overnight after Pearl Harbor,
while the various regional, racial, and
political divisions that roiled the coun-
try must be immediately put aside as
Americans rally toward a shared cause.”
A more complicated reality emerges in
Studs Terkel’s 1984 “ ‘ The Good War’ ”
(the title includes quotation marks be-
cause the notion of a good war seemed
“so incongruous,” Terkel explained), an
oral history that amasses the recollec-
tions of wartime merchant marines, ad-
mirals, U.S.O. entertainers, G.I.s, and
nurses. Their views on the war span “the
sentimental and the disillusioned, the
jingoistic and the thoughtfully patri-
otic, the nostalgic and the dismissive,”
Samet writes.
To investigate cultural attitudes to-
ward G.I.s in the aftermath of the war,
she considers such novels as John Horne
Burns’s “The Gallery” (1947), in which
American soldiers in Italy engage in
black-market transactions with locals;
and such movies as “Suddenly” (1954),
in which Frank Sinatra portrays a vet-
eran turned contract killer who hopes
that his war record will win him sym-
pathy. (“I’m no traitor, Sheriff. I won a
Silver Star.”) In other noir films of the

sullivan associates
ARCHITECTS

martha’s vineyard

+


European Beret $22
100% Wool • One Size Fits All
Black, Navy, Brown, Red, Camel, Grey
Check or Credit Card w/Exp. Date.
Add $4 shipping plus $1 each additional
http://www.johnhelmer.com
John Helmer • Est. 1921 • (503) 223-4976
969 S.W. Broadway, Dept. N121 • Portland, OR 97205

OR .646.6466


JOHN- CHRISTIAN.COM


Crafted from Gold and Platinum

Your Anniversary
Immortalized
in Roman Numerals
Order by12/22 for the Holidays!
Free download pdf