Researching Abnormality 187
But members of nonindustrialized societies are not the only ones who are sus-
ceptible to such cultural forces. In Western cultures over the past two decades,
people diagnosed with depression who are enrolled in studies to evaluate various
medications have responded progressively more strongly to placebos (Walsh et al.,
2002). Over that same two decades, pharmaceutical companies have increasingly
advertised their medications directly to potential consumers, informing them about
the possible benefi ts of the drugs. It is possible that the participants in these studies
became more likely to believe that medication will be helpful than were participants
30 years ago, before direct advertising to consumers.
Feedback Loops in Action: The Placebo Effect
Successful treatments (including placebos) that target one type of factor in turn
affect other types of factors; for example, medication (which targets neurological
factors) affects symptoms related to psychological and social factors. Moreover,
all types of treatment make use of a social factor—cultural norms about what
kinds of interventions are appropriate, be they healer-induced possession trance
or cognitive restructuring. In turn, these norms about appropriate treatment pro-
mote the patient’s beliefs and expectations (psychological factor) regarding how
effective the treatments are. Such beliefs and expectations then infl uence neuro-
logical and social factors, as well as other psychological factors. For example, a
meta-analysis of studies on antidepressant treatments found that about 75–80%
of the antidepressant’s positive effects could be attributed to a placebo response,
leaving at most only about 25% of the response due to the active ingredients
of the medications. Thus, expectations that symptoms will improve may account
for the lion’s share of the positive response to an antidepressant (Kirsch & Lynn,
1999; Kirsch et al., 2002; Kirsch & Sapirstein, 1999; Walach & Maidhof, 1999).
Indeed, more than half of studies of antidepressants that were funded by drug
companies (which, if anything, may have biased the results towards supporting
the effects of medication) found that a placebo was just as effective as the medica-
tion (Kirsch et al., 2002; Kirsch, Scoboria, & Moore, 2002; Moncrieff & Kirsch,
2005). In studies in which the placebo was designed to mimic the side effects of
an antidepressant, the effects of the medication and the placebo were even more
similar (Greenberg & Fisher, 1989).
These results do not necessarily show that placebos and actual antidepressant
drugs have the same effects. Depressed people who responded well to SSRI medication,
for instance, had a different pattern of brain activity than did patients who responded
successfully to a placebo (Leuchter et al., 2002). Again, a patient’s personal beliefs
(psychological factor) about the effects of medication affect what happens in the brain,
and these factors both affect, and are affected by, social factors.
Do the results regarding the placebo effect and antidepressants imply that
depressed people should throw away their medication because they don’t need it
to attain the benefi t? No! Not taking any medication is not the same as taking a
placebo medication. There is something about the act of taking the medication that
engages parts of the mind and brain to reduce depressive symptoms; without the
placebo, these parts of the brain do not become active. There can’t be a placebo
effect without a placebo. So, if an antidepressant works for a patient, not taking
it isn’t at all the same as taking a placebo. (However, other nonmedical treatments
may also be helpful for depression; we will discuss such treatments for that disorder
in Chapter 6.)
What about Carlos and your hypotheses about loss and depression? As in the
discovery of PANDAS, your observations about Carlos led you to identify questions
about the etiology of his depression and about possible treatments. If you were inter-
ested in researching these matters, the particular design and procedure of your study
would depend, in part, on the specifi c question you want to ask and hypothesis you
want to test. You would use the scientifi c method to collect data (after obtaining
approval from an IRB) and refi ne your hypothesis or formulate a theory.
P S
N