The Marketing Book 5th Edition

(singke) #1
feedback the marketer is active,
plans the offers and
communications on the basis of
customer status (profile) and
feedback. Relatively weak
dependency between buyer and
seller, as the goods exchanged
are relatively substitutable and
many buyers and sellers exist.

generally the active party.
Interdependence between the seller
and the customer varies from weak
to relatively strong. The basic
service is often relatively
substitutable, but the service
relationship can be differentiated and
individualized

relationship is unique, its
substitutability depends on the
availability of alternative buyers and
sellers and the amount of switching
costs related to relationship-specific
investments.

seen as subjects. There is often
relatively strong interdependency
between actors, caused by
heterogeneity of resources which
makes substitution difficult.

Topics/concepts
important for
RM

Customer retention, share of
customer, database as a device
for managing direct
communications, integrated use
of channels.

Service encounters, experience &
expectations, service & relationship
quality, life-time value of the
customer, internal marketing,
empowerment of personnel.

Bases of power, uses of power and
conflict behaviour, interdependence,
goal congruity, decision domains,
environmental influence on dyadic
behaviour, transaction-specific
investments, switching costs, dyadic
governance, dyad outcomes:
efficiency, satisfaction, relational
norms.

Interaction processes, adaptation and
investments into relationships, phases
of relationships, actor bonds, resource
ties, activity chains and relationship
outcomes; nets and networks of
relationships; network dynamics and
embeddedness.

Level/unfit of
analysis and
contextuality

Individual consumer, a group of
consumers (segment); in
applications customers are
practically always aggregated
into groups (segments). No
conscious assumptions about
the contextuality of the
customer relationships; the
competitive situation is the
general contextuality
perspective.

Individual customer, group or
segment, service provider–client
relationship. Little emphasis on
contextuality, sometimes the history
of a relationship is emphasized –
generally handled through
‘experience’; generally implicit
assumption about the market as the
dominant environmental form.

Firm, dyadic relationship in the
channel context. Contingency
perspective: dyadic behaviour and
efficient forms of governance are
dependent on the channel context.
Well developed ‘environment’
theory.

Actor (organization, person), dyadic
relationship, net of relationships.
Transactions are episodes in the long-
term relationship. The emphasis is on
the embeddedness of relationships in
nets and networks, and their history –
no understanding of the present
situation without history.

Time
orientation,
focus on
structure vs.
process

Rhetoric emphasizes the long-
term view, no published tools
for handling long-term issues of
relationships. The focus is on
the content of a customer
profile, little emphasis/
conceptual effort on tackling
the dynamism of customer
development.

Earlier emphasis on short-term
encounters, now shifting to a more
enduring relational perspective. The
process aspect is evident, but
empirical research is primarily on
the content of relationship
characteristics.

Emphasis on efficient forms of
channel relationships ranging from
market-like transactions to long-
term reciprocal relationships.
Theoretically dynamic, but the
majority of empirical research is
static; the focus is on structure not
process.

Time is an essential phenomenon.
Dynamic perspective, focus on both
structure (content) and processes
(how dyads, nets, and networks
evolve).

Methodological
orientation

No conscious methodology,
primarily cross-sectional
analysis of survey data and
customer databases.

Divided methodology; North
American emphasis on explanation
through hypothesis testing by
multivariate analysis; Nordic
emphasis on understanding through
qualitative research.

Hypothetical – deductive reasoning,
explanation through hypothesis
testing by multivariate analysis.

Divided methodology, European
emphasis (IMP Group) on
understanding through historical case
analysis; North American emphasis on
explanation through hypothesis testing
by multivariate analysis (this is
primarily limited to dyads).

Source: M ̈oller and Halinen-Kaila (1997, p. 10).

Free download pdf