802 The Marketing Book
Non-store retailing
In that telephone and Internet ordering has
largely replaced the posting of orders, the term
‘home shopping’ has largely replaced ‘mail
order’. In spite of numerous predictions that
home shoppping would take over a large share
of retail trade, its role in most countries is still
fairly modest. As Table 30.13 illustrates, home
shopping was estimated to account for 10 per
cent of non-food sales in the USA by 2003,
rather less in European countries.
Catalogue home shopping
In both the UK and the USA, the history of
‘mail order’ can be traced back to the nine-
teenth century. In the UK, networks of agents
sold through catalogues to ‘clubs’ of friends,
neighbours and fellow workers, as well as
collecting their payments. Their customers
were mainly urban working class and the major
attraction was the credit terms offered. In the
USA, the rural markets were the main focus,
these being inadequately served by other forms
of retailing.
By 1970, home shopping in the UK accoun-
ted for under 5 per cent of all retail trade,
reaching the end of the century at almost the
same level. However, much changed during
that 30-year period, with traditional ‘big book’
mail order and agency networks declining. The
entry of Next Directory breathed new life into
the sector, appealing directly to a much more
up-market clientele. More recently, other retail-
ers’ catalogues, television shopping channels
and Internet retailers have brought new impe-
tus to the sector.
Unlike most retail sectors, home shopping
is actually becoming less concentrated in the
UK, as some of the largest players continue to
lose share. As recently as 1990, GUS (Great
Universal Stores), which includes Kays and
many other catalogue names, held over 30 per
cent of the home shopping market: this had
fallen to under 20 per cent by the end of the
decade. Littlewoods also lost share during that
period, its second place challenged by Otto
Versand of Germany, which acquired both
Grattan and Freemans.
Next Directory, on the other hand, con-
tinues to grow, benefiting from the branding,
buying and logistical synergies of this multi-
channel retailer. GUS also looked to a multi-
channel solution to arrest its decline, through
the acquisition of catalogue showroom trader
Argos. A major advantage of the catalogue
showroom format is that goods can be selected
at home, stock availability checked by tele-
phone, goods then being collected (and inspec-
ted) at one of the showrooms, without having
to wait for home delivery. The combination of
GUS and Argos took the latter into mainstream
home shopping, with the option of home
deliveries, an expanded catalogue and a pres-
ence on digital television.
E-tailing
Electronic retailing has been a long time com-
ing. Commentators were predicting its arrival
35 years ago and, in 1980, Rosenberg and
Hirschman presented vivid scenarios of retail-
ing without stores. However, there have been
many false dawns for e-tailing, numerous
Table 30.13 Home shopping
shares of non-food sales
Country % Country %
Austria 7.5 Japan 3.1
Canada 2.8 Netherlands 4.6
Denmark 5.6 Norway 6.3
France 5.4 Sweden 4.2
Germany 7.0 Switzerland 4.4
Ireland 0.8 UK 7.5
Italy 0.6 USA 10.0
Source: Euromonitor (2000) estimates for 2003.