http://www.geocities.com/~jlhagan/advanced/what_makes_a_masterpiece.htm
Now that is out of the way we can ask; how do we classify works as masterpieces? Answer; by
finding their similarities and judging whether their differences are relevant differences. For this
purpose I list below ten pre -1900 paintings I class as masterpieces. This is not to say there aren't
others ...
Giorgione - The Tempest
Vermeer - Girl with pearl earing
Leonardo - The Mona Lisa
Rembrant - The night watch
Caravaggio - Calling St.Mathew
Velazquez - Las Meninas
Titian - the assumption
Watteau - The clown -Pierot
Turner - The fighting Temairaire
Gerome - Police Versa
THEY ARE ALL SHOWN ON THIS PAGE
It is assumed that what binds these paintings together is more relevant than their differences. So
what binds them? Here we must almost become Toaist in our answer. The artists all ‘walked on rice-
paper but left no footprints’(ie, more becomes less).
In all these works there is mystery, subtlety and a magnetic attraction. The technique is so skilful,
so masterful, so seamless, it is unnoticeable. Like the great actor who makes the audience forget
http://www.geocities.com/~jlhagan/advanced/what_makes_a_masterpiece.htm (2 of 4)1/13/2004 3:37:47 AM