The Sunday Times November 28, 2021 31
NEWS
I haven’t had much call to
stay in London hotel rooms,
having lived in the capital
for over two decades, until
this spring, when I packed
up and moved to
Manchester. Now, needing
to travel south for work (or
even pleasure), I find myself
something of a regular user.
And here’s my observation:
London and its hotel rooms
have a thing against light or,
you know, the people who
need it to survive.
As I trawl booking sites,
wincing at the prices, many
of the sub-£250 rooms I click
on flash with an almost
breezy warning: “No
windows!” That
exclamation mark is doing a
lot of work. “Hey, guys,” it
They say it’s grim up north,
but it’s dark down south
says, “that no-window thing
isn’t really a problem, is it?”
Since when were those
panes of glass inserted into
brick so that you could not
only look outside but also
avoid feeling as if you’ve
been buried alive
considered a luxury?
Premium features in hotels
used to mean a roll-top bath,
matching robes or Cowshed
products lining the shower.
Now it means basics that
make you feel like a human
being. So, no, I didn’t book
the window-less room,
reassured by the
exclamation mark. I paid an
extra 50 quid for what
London would have you
believe is the very height of
luxury: windows.
Who’s that banging away at the
typewriter? Look out ... here’s Terri!
When I left my job as
editor-in-chief of the film
magazine Empire, I was
mainly worried about earning
enough to pay the rent and
finding a half-decent
accountant. But as the days
and weeks ticked by, my
mind started to loosen and
rattle slightly. I like my own
company, but just me, inside
my own head, with only the
same blank, silent page for
company eight hours a day?
No, thank you. All work
(alone) and no play... well,
you know the rest.
After 21 years of working full-
time as an editor and writer
in London and New York, I
recently went freelance.
Along with my job security
and regular wage, I lost the
office (virtual or otherwise)
and, perhaps more
importantly, the people in it.
And let me say that, after
always having felt for Shelley
Duvall in The Shining (weird
kid, cold house, husband
talking to ghosts), over the
past few weeks it’s Jack
Nicholson’s John Torrance —
alone with his typewriter and
blank page — that I’ve
developed if not sympathy
(he’s a fictional psychopath,
after all) then an
understanding for.
Let me explain. Boy, did I
get a kick out of office life. I
liked the camaraderie, the
daily rituals and reassuring
rhythms, spending time
shoulder to shoulder with
people who, to quote Tim
from The Office, I often had
little in common with other
than the fact we walked
around on the same bit of
carpet for eight hours a day.
lJust 21 months into his
life, I was at my son’s very
first parents’ evening. We’d
done all right, I thought.
He’s happy and funny and
hasn’t yet shown a desire to
pull the legs off baby
spiders.
“There’s just one thing,” I
said to his nursery worker.
“On his language — he says a
couple of words, but he’s
just started shouting
‘cheese’. I mean, it is usually
when he wants a snack, but
still.”
She smiled the smile that
they must reserve for
clueless parents. “We’ve
been teaching them to say
‘please’,” she said with
more compassion than I
deserved. My mind went to
the empty Babybel bag, his
finger-pointing pleading
towards the snack
cupboard. In truth, I’d been
so worried about keeping
him alive that it never
occurred to me to make sure
he was polite, too.
Knocked out
all over again
by Rocky IV
The single film I’ve seen most
is Rocky IV.
After the first time at the
age of seven, above the pub
my mum was working in, I’ve
watched it north of 300
times.
There’ll be those who need
a case for Rocky IV, and it’s
this: Sylvester Stallone’s
writing is excellent (Apollo
Creed’s speech about boxing,
masculinity and ageing can’t
be bettered), the soundtrack
glorious and the fight scenes
choreographed with
precision.
So I was thrilled to be
asked to review the new
director’s cut for Empire, the
film magazine I used to edit.
This was to be my first time
ever seeing it at the pictures,
and sitting there, glass of
wine in one hand, hotdog in
the other, as Dolph Lundgren
once again deadpanned, “If
he dies, he dies!” was easily
the highlight of the entire
year so far for me. It was like
the first time all over again.
Terri White
Week Ending
NEWMAN’S
VIEW
I
t was with not an inconsiderable
amount of professional fascination
that I watched the Australian
reporter Matt Doran give a lengthy
on-air apology to Adele last week.
Doran, who I guess is the country’s
equivalent of Susanna Reid, had
been flown to London to carry out
Australia’s “only interview” with the
singer as part of a deal that cost a million
dollars.
Somewhere along the line this
painted little daytime bean had failed to
listen to more than one track from her
new album. This enraged the singer so
much, she demanded a full public
apology: unbelievably, Doran’s
employers agreed.
“I’ve insulted Adele,” he howled at the
end of a show, saying he deserved the
“torrent of abuse and mockery”. He
continued: “To Adele I say, I’d never
have knowingly disrespected you by
deliberately not listening to your work.”
Then he begged for “forgiveness”.
To which I say: have we all gone mad?
Crawling to a primadonna who’s thrown
a pathetic tantrum is something I expect
from North Korea. Reading the book or
listening to the album is useful — but
failing to do so is not a crime, especially
if you simply “missed” the unmarked
email that contained a link to her new
album, as Doran did. If you are a proper
interviewer — a jaded hardcore cow like
moi — the album isn’t the point, anyway.
The idea is to get them to talk about
something they aren’t promoting. To get
to the truth.
What is the truth? It isn’t what would
have been broadcast: 29 minutes of
approved nothingness. For months now
we’ve been hearing endless amniotic
guff about her divorce: I thought it was
impossible to make break-ups boring,
but somehow Adele has. Does anyone
want any more discussion of “the
concept of pure artistry”, “the majesty
of Adele’s voice” or how “Go Easy on Me
was conceived in part by singing a
cappella in the shower”, an anecdote
she has now been hawking for over two
months? Doran has apologised to the
“viewers”, but in fact he is my hero for
inadvertently shielding them from yet
another tedious infomercial.
No one is saying what they think any
more. The risks seem too big, the fans
too angry — to look at this poor, hollow
man, you’d think someone had been
killed. What hope has anyone of what
Doran called “insight” if people like him
are being held to ransom by braindead,
money-obsessed middle managers who
would ideally like to have done the
interview themselves, just to be on the
safe side? Adele should be embarrassed
for participating in such an orgy of
greed-driven fakery. Although, having
watched ITV’s horrific An Audience with
Adele, I sense self-respect and modesty
are not among her gifts.
Wouldn’t it have been better PR for
her — if that’s what she cares about — to
behave with sympathy and grace? She is
always telling us how compassionate she
is, and she must know bad things
happen in interviews. Tapes break; tech
doesn’t work; PRs screw up. I have
always carried three recorders since I
interviewed Michelle Mone about her
divorce: halfway through her tearful
breakdown, the device broke. Unlike
Adele, Mone literally paused her tears
and waited until I fixed it. Even divas can
show good manners. Martin Amis kindly
granted me a second interview after I
turned on my tape and all I could hear
was him saying “nrhrn nhrrhnh”.
If Doran were minded to tell the truth
about his encounter, he’d probably
reveal an equally relatable story of jet lag
and serious incompetence — although
not his. He missed the album because no
one told him they’d be sending the link
in an email that didn’t mention Adele. It
is amusing to me how, in all his
bumbling and desperation to get it right,
he accidentally revealed the truth of the
situation: that Adele is a star now so
consumed by her ego that she will
squish an inconvenient reporter before
It’s not something you expect
to see more than once an
hour: Madonna’s butthole.
But it was there again on
Thursday: the 63-year-old
pop star posted a pic of
herself face down on the
floor, fishnets straining,
rummaging under a bed.
What was she looking for?
A Rice Krispie? A stray South
American model/waiter/
whatever? I’m not one of
those who scream at her to
put her clothes back on and
Another pic of the week is
surely the MP Stella Creasy,
snapped at a dinner late on
Wednesday with her
three-month-old son.
We’re told that this was
part of a publicity push to
highlight the lack of
maternity cover for female
MPs after Creasy was told
she must no longer bring him
into debates at the House of
Commons.
It was not “practical to
leave him somewhere else”,
she warbled, as she was
breastfeeding, so he had to
“come with me for now”.
I don’t buy any of it. I don’t
think he needs to be in the
chamber when there is a
crèche only metres away,
and I don’t believe she can’t
pump. I don’t think the needs
of female MPs are that
pressing, when there are only
200 of them in the country
and they have excellent
maternity provision already.
For ordinary women
labouring at the nappy face
from six until midnight or
more, how does all this look?
It must seem very strange
to watch a posh woman,
dressed not unlike Emma
Thompson, parading her
baby at parties in some must-
have sling and telling people
it is her human right to get
her breasts out in front of
Boris Johnson.
retain some “dignity”. She’s
been dry-humping national
flags for decades — get over
it. But this time I admit I
enjoyed the response.
There was an avalanche of
merciless memes with bums
out. The TV presenter
Anneka Rice said: “Madonna
and I are exactly the same
age. If I tried that, I’d never be
able to get up.” If there’s one
positive to take from social
media, it’s the ability to mock
stupid celebrities.
Nothing like Madonna’s bum
to have us rolling on the floor
Most new
mums would
kill to have
Creasy’s woes
The idea is to
get the star
to talk about
something
they aren’t
promoting
Matt Doran,
Australia’s
equivalent of
Susanna Reid,
delivered a
painful on-air
apology for not
having listened
to Adele’s new
album before
interviewing her
swiping an interview she dislikes off air.
The record label controlled the footage:
how does that even happen?
I’m even beginning to wonder if
research is overrated. I remember
commissioning a famous novelist to
interview Katie Price. She told me she
didn’t want to read loads of previous
articles because she wanted to be
original. Larry King, the late-night chat
show host, cared so little for being a
greasy swot, he’d interview people
without knowing who they were. If he
failed to understand what they were
saying, he’d just shout: “Why?”
I wish someone like him would
interview Adele. “I wrote an album to
get over my divorce,” she’d say. “Why?”
he’d scream. “I’ve written an album
about it,” she’d warble. “Why?”
Control-freak Adele shows there is
now no point to celebrity interviews
COMMENT
Camilla Long
CLIFF LIPSON/CBS/GETTY IMAGES