Lecture 46: The Next 100 Years
The Next 100 Years ........................................................................
Lecture 46
As I worked on these lectures, I soon realized that historians seem to
be more or less the only people who refuse to think seriously about
the future.
A
fter surveying 13 billion years, can we resist peering into the future?
I think not. Indeed, I will argue that it is appropriate and necessary
to do so. I was ¿ rst prompted to do this by students who argued
that, after surveying 13 billion years, it seemed odd to stop abruptly in the
present moment. As a professional historian, I shared the historian’s taboo on
considering the future. So I had to think hard about how I should approach
such a topic. Why and how should historians study the future? I soon realized
that thinking about the future is not such a strange activity! On the contrary,
all human societies have tried to predict the future, and many professionals
in our own society—from stockbrokers to gamblers—make a good living by
doing so.
Furthermore, we must take our thoughts about the future seriously because
they may inÀ uence what we do today, and that in turn may shape the future.
Besides, all organisms constantly try to predict; indeed, they are designed by
natural selection to do so. Every time you act, you have to predict the likely
outcome of your action, and sometimes (as in crossing a busy road) it’s vital
to predict wisely.
How should we think about the future? Rule 1 is that the future really is
unpredictable. Nineteenth-century physicists often claimed we could predict
the future if we knew the motion and position of every particle in the
Universe. Quantum physics has shown this is not true. At the very smallest
scales there is a certain indeterminacy in the behavior of the Universe. Rule
2 is that those who think carefully about the future get it right more often
(and, if they are stockbrokers or gamblers, earn more money) than those who
do not. Rule 3 is that we must begin with existing trends—in other words,
with history. A horse’s “form” is not a perfect guide to performance, but it’s
better than nothing.