The Psychology of Gender 4th Edition

(Tuis.) #1
118 Chapter 4

Sex Comparisons in Social Domains


Cognitive abilities are assessed by standardized
tests and measures. Social abilities are a little
trickier. How do we judge which sex is more
helpful, more sexual, more empathic, or more
aggressive? Should we rely on self-report mea-
sures? Do people know their own abilities, or
will they distort their abilities in the direction of
the ability they ought to have? Perhaps observ-
ing behavior is a better method to assess social
abilities. But observers could be biased in their
perceptions and interpretations of a behavior.

climate may contribute to a greater publi-
cation of studies that show no differences.

TAKE HOME POINTS

■ In many cognitive domains, males’ scores are more
variable than females’ scores.
■ One way cognitive sex comparisons have been captured
is that women are better at tasks that involve verbal
abilities and diffuse attention, whereas men are bet-
ter at tasks that require rotating objects and focused
attention.

8

6

4

2

 2

0

Rotation-Verbal

 4

 6

 8
 6  4  2
Focus-Diffusion

0246

FIGURE 4.10 Women (indicated by the darker dots) score higher than
men on abilities that are verbal and require diffuse attention, whereas men
(indicated by the lighter dots) score higher than women on abilities that
require spatial rotation and focused attention.
Source: Johnson and Bouchard (2007).

M04_HELG0185_04_SE_C04.indd 118 6/21/11 8:02 AM

Free download pdf