The Psychology of Gender 4th Edition

(Tuis.) #1
Communication 245

characteristics imply a lack of communal
characteristics among women—and a lack
of communal characteristics is detrimen-
tal to women. When Hillary Clinton ran for
the Democratic nominee for president of the
United States, her strong, decisive, and overall
agentic manner was judged harshly. Her rat-
ings became more positive after a brief epi-
sode in which she shed a tear in response to an
interviewer asking her how she was able to get
out of the house everyday to hit the campaign
trail. The expression of emotion reminded
people of her communal qualities.
To be effective leaders, research sug-
gests that women need to combine agentic
qualities with communal qualities (Johnson
et al., 2008). One study showed that provid-
ing information about a leader’s communal
traits offset the penalty applied to agentic
women (Heilman & Okimoto, 2007). Col-
lege students read vignettes about a manager

of a finance department (masculine occupa-
tion) that either contained communal infor-
mation (i.e., caring and sensitive), positive
noncommunal information (fair minded), or
no additional information. The woman was
perceived as less desirable as a boss, more
hostile, and less likeable than the man in the
control and noncommunal conditions, but
these biases disappeared in the communal
condition, as shown in Figure 7.8.
Another way that women can overcome
the bias against female leaders is to establish a
“shared identity” with others. This was dem-
onstrated in a study of college students who
listened to a recording of a female speaker
who used assertive or tentative language and
was referred to as either a typical female (sex
salient) or a typical college student (student
salient; Reid et al., 2009). When her sex was
made salient, men were more influenced
by the tentative than the assertive speaker,

FIGURE 7.8 Women were viewed as less desirable than men as a
boss in the control condition and the positive noncommunal infor-
mation condition but there was no sex difference in desirability when
communal information was provided.
Source: Adapted from Heilman and Okimoto (2007).

2

0

4

6

8

Male Female Male Female Male Female
Communal

Boss Desirability

Positive
Non-Communal

Control

n.s.

M07_HELG0185_04_SE_C07.indd 245 6/21/11 8:11 AM

Free download pdf