The Psychology of Gender 4th Edition

(Tuis.) #1
266 Chapter 8

involved in the interaction as well as rating
scales of the quality of the interaction. Al-
though the RIR was initially administered via
paper, today similar types of instruments have
been developed for electronic devices.
In a now classic study, college students
completed the RIR for every 10-minute in-
teraction they had every day for 2 consecu-
tive weeks (Wheeler et al., 1983). As shown
in Figure 8.5a, researchers found a consistent
sex difference in the meaningfulness of in-
teractions, measured as the average of each
interaction’s intimacy, self-disclosure, other
disclosure, pleasantness, and satisfaction (i.e.,
the first five ratings scales shown in Figure 8.4).
Men’s same-sex interactions were significantly
less meaningful than women’s, even when in-
teractions with a best friend were examined.
All interactions involving at least one female
(female-female, male-female) were equally
meaningful and were more meaningful than
those involving only males. This study showed

men (Barry et al., 2009). Women even receive
more supportive comments from friends on
their personal Web pages compared to men
(Mikami et al., 2010).
Most of these studies arrive at these con-
clusions via self-report surveys. One way that
researchers have been able to get a better sense
of the closeness of women’s and men’s friend-
ships is with a method called the Rochester
Interaction Record (RIR). Researchers from
the University of Rochester developed the RIR
to describe the nature of social interactions
on a day-to-day or moment-to-moment basis
(Wheeler, Reis, & Nezlek, 1983). Participants
complete an RIR for every 10-minute interac-
tion they have over the course of a day. This
may seem quite cumbersome, but many of
our daily interactions are much briefer, lasting
only a minute or two. People typically report
about seven or eight 10-minute interactions
during an average day. The RIR, shown in
Figure 8.4, contains questions about who was

FIGURE 8.4 Rochester Interaction Record.
Source: L. Wheeler, H. Reis, and J. Nezlek (1983). Loneliness, social interaction,
and sex roles. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 943–953.

Date

Initials If More Than 3 Others:
Sex # Of Females # Of Males
Intimacy: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
1 2 3 4 5 6 7

I Disclosed: Very Little A Great Deal
Other Disclosed: Very Little A Great Deal
Quality: Unpleasant Pleasant
Satisfaction: Less Than Expected More Than Expected
Initiation: I Initiated Other Initiated
Influence:

Nature: Work Task Pastime

LONELINESS

Conversation Date

I Influenced More Other Influenced More

Time AM
PM

Length Hrs Mins

Superficial Meaningful

M08_HELG0185_04_SE_C08.indd 266 6/21/11 8:12 AM

Free download pdf