The Psychology of Gender 4th Edition

(Tuis.) #1
274 Chapter 8

Emotional Inexpressiveness


A third barrier to closeness in men’s same-sex
relationships is emotional inexpressiveness.
Men tend to express less emotion in rela-
tionships compared to women. Inexpressive-
ness may help to maintain power, but at the
expense of closeness. Men may avoid ex-
pressing their emotions because doing so
would appear feminine. Revealing weaknesses
and vulnerabilities is inconsistent with the
male role. However, failing to reveal one’s
emotions and problems makes it difficult
for others to provide support when needed.
Indeed, restricted emotions have been linked
to reduced social support, which has been
linked to increased psychological distress
(Wester et al., 2007). One way in which men
are able to be expressive in the context of re-
lationships is by compensating with increased
masculine behavior in other arenas, such as
more instrumental behavior (Migliaccio, 2009).
In fact, self-disclosure between men usually
takes place in the context of shared activities
(Radmacher & Azmitia, 2006). Having some-
thing to do during the interaction may make
men feel more comfortable self-disclosing.
Another reason men may not self-
disclose as much as women has nothing to do
with men’s personalities but has to do with
society’s expectations of men. This would
be a structural level of analysis. Men are not
viewed as favorably as women when they

among the different kinds of competition
mattered more for boys’ than girls’ friend-
ships. Another kind of competition that has
been studied is personal development com-
petition, which is aimed at using competition
for self-improvement. Personal development
competition appears to be a healthy kind
of competition for both males and females
(Burckle et al., 1999; Ryckman et al., 1997).

Homophobia


Another reason men are uncomfortable with
closeness in their same-sex friendships is
homophobia, defined as the fear of homo-
sexuality or the fear of appearing homosexual.
Because men do not want to appear to be ho-
mosexual, they limit their physical contact and
their emotional closeness with other men, re-
serving those kinds of contacts for romantic
relationships with women. Homophobia seems
to be tied to men’s identities. Men who have
higher gender self-esteem, meaning that they
are more likely to endorse statements such as
“I am proud to be a male,” have more nega-
tive attitudes toward homosexuals (Falomir-
Pichastor & Mugny, 2009). Interestingly, when
the threat of homosexuality is removed by con-
vincing men that homosexuality has a biologi-
cal basis, homophobia is reduced. Apparently,
upon hearing that homosexuality is due to biol-
ogy, heterosexual men no longer have a need to
differentiate themselves from homosexuals.

TABLE 8.1 THE NATURE OF COMPETITION

Hypercompetition intense desire to win, associated with hostility; disregard
for opponent
“I get upset when X wins.”
“Winning makes me feel powerful.”
Nonhostile social comparison comparison of achievement without hostility
“I like to play X to see who is better.”
Enjoyment of competition intense involvement in activity
“I like to playX for the fun of it.”
Personal development competition competition for self-improvement
“Competition helps me to be the best I can be.”

M08_HELG0185_04_SE_C08.indd 274 6/21/11 8:12 AM

Free download pdf