The Psychology of Gender 4th Edition

(Tuis.) #1
Paid Worker Role and Health 463

Why do the occupations men enter pay
more than the occupations women enter?
One theory is that sex is used to determine
the wage of an occupation. The proportion of
women in a given occupation is directly and
inversely related to the wage (Dunn, 1996). In
other words, a job is worth less if women are
more likely than men to hold it. In fact, people
assume that jobs inhabited by men pay more
than jobs inhabited by women—a phenome-
non referred to as thesalary estimation effect.
Two studies—one of college students and one
of community members—showed that when
given a series of jobs to which male or female
names are randomly assigned, respondents
estimate higher salaries for jobs associated
with male names than jobs associated with
female names (Williams, Paluck, & Spencer-
Rodgers, 2010). Male respondents were more
likely to show the salary estimation effect than
females. Interestingly, the salary estimation
effect was unrelated to awareness of the actual
pay gap. Instead, implicit stereotypes regard-
ing gender were associated with the salary
estimation effect. Using an Implicit Associa-
tion Test, respondents who linked being male
with wealth were more likely to show the sal-
ary estimation effect. In another study, college
students were provided with job descriptions
that contained the same educational qualifi-
cations, same skills, and same responsibilities
but the gender-related nature of the industry
was varied to be masculine (e.g., automo-
tive) or feminine (e.g., gourmet food; Alksnis,
Desmarais, & Curtis, 2008). As shown in
Figure 12.11, both men and women assigned
higher pay to jobs (clerk in Figure 12.11a and
editor in 12.11b) assumed to be held by male
employees than female employees.
The resolution to this issue is thecom-
parable worth policy, which states that men
and women in different jobs should be paid
the same wage for comparable work. The

and men work in different occupations, and
different occupations have different salaries.
Many factors contribute to occupational seg-
regation. Traditional gender role is one factor.
As shown in Figure 12.10, traditional gender
roles are related to more income for men but
less income for women (Judge & Livingston,
2008). One reason is that traditional gender
roles are related to occupational segregation.
Men with traditional gender roles are likely
to be in higher-paying occupations inhab-
ited by men, such as technology, and women
with traditional gender roles are likely to be
in lower-paying occupations inhabited by
women, such as service industries. Sex segre-
gation of occupations declined in the 1970s
as women moved into occupations that had
traditionally been inhabited by men, such as
medicine and law. However, there has been
less change in occupational segregation in the
1980s and 1990s, and after the turn of the cen-
tury. Occupational integration does not solve
all the problems. Even if similar numbers of
women and men are in a particular occupa-
tion, they often hold different positions.


  • 1 SD
    More Egalitarian


+ 1 SD
More Traditional

15,000

17,000

19,000
Annual Earnings

27,000

21,000

23,000

25,000 Men

Women

FIGURE 12.10 Traditional gender roles are
strongly related to more income for men; tradi-
tional gender roles are slightly related to less in-
come for women.
Source: Adapted from Judge and Livingston (2008).

M12_HELG0185_04_SE_C12.indd 463 6/21/11 9:16 AM

Free download pdf