The Economist December 4th 2021 Britain 57
search presented. The reportreliesona
handful of articles and interviews,noneof
which establishes evidence ofharm.Much
is made of an online perceptionsurvey
based on a sixminute fictionalvideoclip,
and a single question in a unrepresentative
survey by an American transgenderlobby
group. The growing numberof“detransi
tioners”—people who identifyastrans,on
ly later to change their mind—isignored.
The third big complaint isthatthepro
posals would introduce the nebulouscon
cept of “gender identity” to Britishlawfor
the first time. In 2020 a grassrootscam
paign by feminists succeededinforcing
the government to abandonplanstoallow
anyone to change their legalsexatwill.
That would, in effect, havemadeselfde
scribed gender identity the decidingfactor
in who counted legally as a manora wom
an, abolishing singlesex spacesandser
vices at a stroke. The plansare“asmoke
screen for bringing genderidentityideol
ogy into law,” says Maya Forstater,oneof
the founders of Sex Matters,anorganisa
tion campaigning for sexbasedrights.
The consultation comes asanindepen
dent review of genderidentityservicesfor
children is under way, led byHillaryCass,a
former president of the RoyalCollegeof
Paediatrics and Child Health.Findingsare
expected next year. “Why notwaituntil
after Cass is published?” asksDrBell.But
the government faces a dilemma.Itwants
to appeal to younger voters byshowingit is
not stodgy, while also signallingtosocially
conservative older and workingclassvot
ers that it is not too “woke”.
This complicates a second uturnon
trans issues in quick succession.Andif the
bill goes before Parliamentinitscurrent
form, mps may fear voting againstit,even
though many Conservativesandgrowing
numbers on the Labour benchesareunea
sy. Few voters realise howmuchiscon
cealed by the phrase “conversiontherapy”,
and mps may fear being smearedasbigots.
Perhaps most worrying istheimpacton
children. Many, it seems, areinterpreting
the stirrings of samesex attractionasindi
cating a trans identity. In anarticlelast
year in BJPsych Bulletin, a medicaljournal,
Lucy Griffin, a consultant psychiatristin
Bristol, and coauthors foundthat,ofthe
girls referred to gids in onecalendaryear,
only 8.5% were primarily attractedtoboys.
Collateral damage
Once such children reach 16,genderclinics
will prescribe synthetic hormones.Such
drugs were used to “chemicallycastrate”
Alan Turing, Dr Griffin pointsout.Thegay
mathematician, whose codebreaking
helped defeat the Nazis, acceptedthedrugs
as an alternative to a prison sentence.“The
whole thing”, says Dr Griffin,“risksbecom
ing an exercise in damagingthepeople
they are setting out to protect.”n
Spycraft
Open book
F
orthebetterpartofa century,themain
preoccupationsoftheheadofBritain’s
SecretIntelligenceService,morecommon
ly knownasmi6,havebeenthemalfea
sanceofRussiansorterroristsor—asinthe
latest James Bond movie, “No Time to
Die”—some combination of both. But
times are changing. On November30th
RichardMoore,thespyagency’sboss,gave
hisfirstpublicspeechsincetakingcharge
inOctober2020.Russiaandterrorismfea
turedonhislistofthe“bigfour”priorities,
asdidthechallengefromIran’srevolution
aryregime,whichismovingsteadilycloser
tobeingabletodevelopa nuclearweapon.
But despite Russia’s alarming military
builduparoundUkraine(seeEuropesec
tion)anda recentterroristattackinLiver
pool,Chinawashisprimaryconcern.
“Adaptingtoa worldaffectedbytherise
ofChinaisthesinglegreatestpriorityfor
mi6,” declared Mr Moore. Such a pro
nouncement wouldhave been unthink
ableadecadeago,whenDavidCameron
andGeorgeOsborne,hischancellor,were
desperatetocourtChinesetradeandin
vestment, and eager to play down the
threatfromtheCommunistParty’shackers
andintelligenceofficers.
Thepoliticalwindsnowblowfroma
different direction. A review of foreign
policy in March concluded that China
poseda “systemicchallenge...tooursecuri
ty,prosperityandvalues”.InMayBritain
beganrippingoutChinesemadeHuawei
kit from its 5gmobile networks. It recently
sent an aircraftcarrier to Asia, part of an
eastward surge of warships. It is also in
creasing coordination on intelligence and
military issues regarding China with its
partners in the Five Eyes, a grouping that
also includes America, Australia, Canada
and New Zealand.
Mr Moore, who joined mi6 during the
cold war and spent much of his career in
the Middle East, said that his service was
also changing tack. “We are deepening our
understanding of China across the uk in
telligence community, and widening the
options available to the government in
managing the systemic challenges that it
poses,” he said. Chinese spies are, he
warned, “highly capable” and conducting
“largescale espionage”. They are monitor
ing and coercing the Chinese diaspora in
Britain and using social media to “distort
public discourse”.
But Mr Moore’s most urgent warning re
lated to science and technology. China, he
said, was “expanding the web of authori
tarian control around the planet” by ex
porting surveillance technology. That was
not only a problem for recipients made
vulnerable to Chinese coercion, but also
for mi6 itself. “Our officers need to operate
invisibly to our adversaries,” he noted. Chi
nese control of smartphones, apps and
telecommunications networks, as well as
access to vast repositories of personal in
formation—such as data from home genet
ictesting kits and biometric security at
airports—have spun a “worldwide surveil
lance web” that makes it harder for mi6 of
ficers to operate abroad without their
names and histories being uncovered.
That Mr Moore chose to air such con
cerns in a public forum is itself a novelty.
His agency was not officially avowed, nor
were its chiefs named, until some years
after he joined it in 1987. Perhaps because
of the years he spent aboveboard as a dip
lomat, he is unusually communicative. He
continues to operate his Twitter account, a
rarity among spymasters.
Such openness also has a wider pur
pose, however. As threats evolve, intelli
gence services must work with tech com
panies and other outside talent to stay
ahead. That requires, said Mr Moore, a
“seachange...in mi6’s culture, ethos and
way of working”. The same urgency is visi
ble in increasingly vigorous attempts to re
cruit a wider range of people, something it
has struggled to do despite years of effort.
In 2021, mi6 even began advertising in
The Economistfor “individuals with diverse
skill sets and life experiences” to take part
time and consulting roles. More surpris
ingly still, it welcomed applications from
British and foreign nationals alike. The re
sult is a seemingparadox. “To stay secret,”
said Mr Moore, “wearegoing to have to be
come more open.”n
China looms ever larger for British
spies, says mi6’s chief
Aspook who likes to speak