- ium ions II or III at the carbon of each that bears
the greater positive charge, in accord with Markovnikov regiochemistry. - The C–Br bond lengths of bromonium ions I, II, and III:
Nucleophile reacts with bromon
Fig al
stabilize the positive charge. A lesser electron density contribution
from bromine is needed because additional alkyl groups help stabilize
1) In the bromonium ion of ethene (I), the C–Br bond lengths are identical (2.06Å).
2)
ereas the one with the 1°carbon is 2.03Å.
lectron density from the bromine to the 2° carbon, because the
an the 1° carbon.
3 n
c
i) cates that significantly less
etter than the 1° carbon.
5.
2-methylpropene:
1) should focus on are those opposite the
three membered ring portion of the bromonium ion.
ure 8.B The carbon-bromine bond length (shown in angstroms) at the centr
carbon increases as less electron density from the bromine is needed to
the charge
In the bromonium ion of propene (II), the C–Br bond involving the 2° carbon is
2.17Å, wh
i) The longer bond length to the 2° carbon is consistent with the lesser
contribution of e
2° carbon can accommodate the charge better th
) I the bromonium ion of 2-methylpropene (III), the C–Br bond involving the 3°
arbon is 2.39Å, whereas the one with the 1°carbon is 1.99Å.
The longer bond length to the 3° carbon indi
contribution of electron density from the bromine to the 3° carbon, because the
3° carbon can accommodate the charge b
ii) The bond at the 1° carbon is like that expected for typical alkyl bromide.
The lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO) of ethane, propene, and
The lobes of the LUMO on which we