38 Monday December 6 2021 | the times
Business
As details of an alleged fraud at Arena
Television emerged last week, some
onlookers expressed shock, both at the
scale of the supposed scam at the
outdoor broadcast company and the
number of banks and non-bank credit
providers caught up in it.
The business, which had turnover of
£30 million a year and worked on
events such as the Glastonbury music
festival, Six Nations’ rugby and the
Euro 2020 football championship in
the summer, is thought to have
borrowed £280 million from at least 20
lenders, with administrators under-
stood to have been called in when an
auditor acting for one of Arena TV’s
lenders tried to verify serial numbers
for company-owned equipment used as
security for loans. When the auditor
called the equipment supplier, they
were told that the numbers did not
exist.
Arena has outstanding charges in
favour of Clydesdale Bank and Nat-
West, while its holding company, also
bust, has outstanding charges in favour
of Close Invoice Finance and Barclays.
Other high street banks and non-bank
lenders are caught up in the collapse,
including HSBC, Shawbrook, Santan-
der and United Trust.
It is also embarrassing for the
government. The Times revealed last
week that millions of pounds of loans to
the company comprised emergency
pandemic credit underwritten by the
state. The Sunday Times reported that
furloughed staff at Arena had com-
plained of being told to return to work
at the business while being paid by the
government-backed wages scheme.
The scandal is thought to be one of
the biggest alleged frauds in the history
of asset-based lending. While casual
observers were surprised at how what is
ultimately a small business appeared to
have received hundreds of millions in
credit from such an array of lenders,
some in the leasing and asset-based
lending industries said they were sur-
prised only that something like this had
not happened before.
Nic Conner, a former finance broker,
said: “With asset finance, the lender
doesn’t look at the company at all. All
they care about is the asset and its
residual value. Some lenders, the good
ones, will want a site visit and even have
their own serial number welded on; but
so many will just ask for a photo.”
A senior finance executive in the
industry who has run large asset
finance loan books said that he had
been expecting a large fraud. The exec-
utive, who asked not to be named,
claimed that “standards slipped” in the
sector as it became more competitive,
with more non-bank credit providers
and smaller banks entering the market,
and that several lenders had watered
down procedures that normally would
involve physically checking the equip-
ment against which finance has been
provided.
“Many don’t do inspections and, if
they did, they did it on a retrospective
basis after the loans were drawn down,”
he said. “This opens the door for fraud.
There will be more cases like this, for
sure.
“It is a cost of having a branchless,
remote offering. When I was running
[an asset-based lender], we would insist
on asset inspections on all higher-value
items and/or where the borrower had a
reasonable credit line comprising lots
of lower-value items.” Staff would visit
the customer’s site and inspect the asset
and the equipment supplier’s invoice on
delivery of the kit borrowed against.
that as competition had increased,
some smaller lenders might be less cap-
able of absorbing losses from big frauds.
“In their drive to grow their books, they
got aggressive on price and won’t have
adequately factored this cost into their
lending margins,” he said.
Adrian Walsh, chief executive of
CheckVentory, a business that digitally
validates assets before, during and after
the underwriting process, said: “The
asset finance market has been fairly
benign in terms of risk for several years
and that may have led to complacency.
We find it fairly easy to get in front of
lenders, as they have an interest in this
area but most stick with their tradi-
tional methodologies.”
Interest may soon increase. Will
Wright, head of restructuring at Inter-
path Advisory, told The Sunday Times:
“This is pretty unprecedented stuff and
the finance industry will be looking
hard for lessons to learn.”
As well as physical checks, increased
vigilance on data could help lenders to
spot future scams. Katrin Herrling,
chief executive of Funding Xchange, a
small company lending marketplace,
said that the “data is already out there”
to help lenders to spot potential frauds,
but added that the challenge for organi-
sations was whether they were set up to
act on red flags.
Ben Sher, leader of Funding
Xchange’s technology division, said:
“There is an awful lot of data. The diffi-
cult part is creating actionable insights,
which requires recognising patterns
amongst the noise.” Funding Xchange
hopes to convince lenders of the power
of data to make better decisions. It has
launched a “portfolio monitoring” tool
that tracks thousands of data points to
establish patterns, such as a jump in
lending contracts signed by a borrower.
Andrew Holgate, a commercial
finance expert and chief executive at
Equitivo, a financial technology advis-
er, said that lenders would face awk-
ward questions over whether they had
verified assets and checked that they
did not have debts linked with them. “It
seems some basic fundamentals were
missed,” he said, adding that although
there may be increased scrutiny of
borrowers, “banks lose money all the
time. This is just larger than normal.”
“This meant we knew the asset actually
existed and the invoice had the [len-
der’s] name on it, which helps prevent a
borrower taking out lots of loans on the
same asset.”
Lending against kit plays a big role in
business finance. There are two ways of
doing so: leasing, in which equipment
effectively is owned by the bank and
leased to the business; and asset-based
lending, where equipment is pledged as
security but is owned by the customer.
Arena appears to have been doing both.
There was £27 billion of new leasing
finance in 2020, £16 billion of which
went to small and mid-sized compa-
nies. Invoice and asset-based lenders
advance £22 billion to 42,000 UK busi-
nesses.
The former finance executive said
Katrin Herrling, of
Funding Xchange,
says the “data is
there” to help spot
potential frauds
Investment in property technology has
reached record levels as the industry
seeks to harness enthusiasm for the
sector.
Investors have poured £1.6 billion into
British “proptech” companies this year,
according to data from Pi Labs, a
property technology backer. That is
more than four times the £348 million it
attracted last year and 15 times higher
than the £106 million achieved in 2016.
Britain is home to a growing number
Big players join race to back new hot properties in technology
of businesses looking to bring new
technology to a famously slow-moving
industry. The biggest fundraising in the
sector this year was by Proportunity,
which pulled in more than £100 million
in a mixture of debt and equity in
October. The company claims to offer
an equity loan to homebuyers, similar
to the government’s Help to Buy
scheme “but with fewer restrictions”.
Plentific, which raised £73 million in
a fundraising round over the summer,
has built an online marketplace where
landlords and homeowners can adver-
tise jobs that need doing to tradesmen
and women. Mubadala, the huge Abu
Dhabi sovereign wealth fund, took part
in the fundraising.
Other companies have latched on to
the need of landlords and developers to
improve their sustainability creden-
tials. The built environment is esti-
mated to account for 40 per cent of the
UK’s carbon footprint and investors are
putting pressure on companies to
address shortcomings in this area.
Among them is the London-based
Satellite Vu, which tapped investors for
£15 million in October. It plans to send
seven thermal and infrared imaging
satellites into space. The cameras,
which are being assembled in Guild-
ford, Surrey, can take pictures of build-
ings several times a day. In theory, that
will allow businesses, insurers and
lenders to see how energy-efficient a
building is.
“Proptech investment is growing
significantly year-on-year, as the real
estate sector is increasingly aware of
the operational performance gaps that
have been unaddressed for a number of
years,” Faisal Butt, chief executive of
Pi Labs, said. “As the UK real estate
sector wakes up to the changes
required to reach net-zero targets,
landlords, investors and occupiers are
realising that technological adoption
will play a crucial role in future-
proofing assets and meeting sustain-
ability pledges.”
Butt, 44, added that “generalist
venture capital firms, particularly tech-
nology-focused Silicon Valley inves-
tors, are also now starting to get in on
the action”.
Tom Howard
Glastonbury broadcaster’s collapse leaves
experts up in arms over lack of oversight
The Glastonbury music festival in Somerset was among the events worked on by the collapsed Arena TV, which borrowed about £280 million from at least 20 lenders
Arena TV was an
accident waiting to
happen. More will follow,
write James Hurley and
Katherine Griffiths
JOSEPH OKPAKO/GETTY IMAGES