References 245
Condron, Frances. 2000a. Starting points on the Internet. In Condron,
Fraser, and Sutherland (eds.), 13–18.
2000b.Fontsandspecialcharacters.InCondron,Fraser,andSutherland
(eds.), 233–5.
Condron, Frances, Michael Fraser, and Stuart Sutherland (eds.). 2000.
CTI[=Computers in Teaching Initiative]textual studies: guide to
digital resources for the humanities.Oxford: University of Oxford,
Humanities Computing Unit.
Connery, Brian A. 1996. Authority and egalitarian rhetoric in the virtual
coffeehouse. In Porter (ed.), 161–79.
Cotton, Bob, and Malcolm Garrett. 1999.You ain’t seen nothing yet: the
future of media and the global expert system.London: Institute of
Contemporary Arts.
Cowan, Andrew. 1997. History of MUDs.
http://www.mudconnect.com/mudintro.html.
Crystal, David. 1969. Prosodic systems and intonation in English.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
1984.Who cares about English usage?Harmondsworth: Penguin.
1995.The Cambridge encyclopedia of the English language.Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
1997a.The Cambridge encyclopedia of language,2nd edn. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
1997b. Dictionary of linguistics and phonetics,4th edn. Oxford:
Blackwell.
1997c.English as a global language.Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press.
1997d. A Lexical Filter Internet Enquirer (ALFIE). White paper for
AND Classification Data, Rotterdam and Oxford.
1998.Language play.Harmondsworth: Penguin.
- Language BLANK literature: from conjunction to preposition.
English Today,15, 13–21.
Crystal, David, and Derek Davy. 1969.InvestigatingEnglishstyle.London:
Longman.
1976.Advanced conversational English.London: Longman.
Crystal, David, and Randolph Quirk. 1964.Systems of prosodic and para-
linguistic features in English. The Hague: Mouton.
Cumming, John D. 1995. The Internet and the English language.English
Today11(1), 3–8.
Daniels, Peter T., and William Bright (eds.). 1996.The world’s writing
systems.Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Danielson, Peter. 1996. Pseudonyms, mailbots, and virtual letterheads:
the evolution of computer-mediated ethics. In Charles Ess (ed.),