Microsoft Word - Revised dissertation2.docx

318

Comparison: Q vs MT

TOTAL PLL

Orth. Variant

SU per Orth. Variant

Orth. (l) Variant

SU per Orth. (l) Variant

Stylistic (Type 1) Variant

SU per St. (1) Variant

Stylistic (Type 2) Variant

SU per St. (2) Variant

Stylistic (Type 3) Variant

SU per St. (3) Variant

Herm. Variant

SU per Herm. Variant

4QGen

e^

386

5

39

5

43

1

386

4QGen

g^

363

9

20

2

91

2

91

MurExod

318

4QDeut

g^

312

5QDeut

309

6

27

2

77

4

52

3

44

4QDeut

k1^

295

18

9

6

25

5

33

4

27

MurGen

a^

292

2QExod

a^

302

15

11

1

151

4

36

6

20

4QDeut

e^

284

1

142

1

71

4QGen

f^

284

3

52

1

142

3

57

2

28

1

36

SdeirGen

268

4QDeut

k2^

262

18

8

12

12

6

33

2

44

4QGen

c^

262

7

19

2

65

1

131

4QLev

c^

253

1

127

1

127

4QLev

d^

251

7

19

3

84

7

15

4QDeut

a^

248

2

62

1

248

1

50

4QDeut

i^

237

4

32

1

118

XHev/SeNum

b^

332

4QLev

e^

217

1

109

1

217

4

43

1QpaleoLev

216

4

29

2

72

4QDeut

o^

200

5

21

1

100

11QLev

b^

188

5

20

1

94

2

94

3

125

1

34

MasLev

a^

177

1QDeut

a^

211

14

8

17

6

3

47

5

21

4QGen

d^

168

4

22

4QDeut

m^

158

9

9

15

6

4

26

1

79