4QDeutk1 2 10 hkylgrb pronunciation.
Q724 MT Deut 11:12 Kyhl) OV(l) – Possible difference in
4QDeutk1 2 12 hkyhwl) pronunciation.
Q725 MT Deut 11:12 hn#h SV(1) – 4QDeutk1 lacks the con-
4QDeutk1 2 13 hn# junction.
Q726 MT Deut 19:9 Kwcm SV(1) – Difference in number.^1229
4QDeutk2 1 3 hmk[
Q727 MT Deut 19:10 Kyl( OV(l) – Possible difference in
4QDeutk2 1 5 hkyl( pronunciation.
Q728 MT Deut 19:11 omits SV(1) – The MT lacks the prepo-
4QDeutk2 1 6 Nm sition Nm.
Q729 MT Deut 19:11 l)h OV(l) – Possible difference in
4QDeutk2 1 6 hl)h pronunciation.^1230
Q730 MT Deut 19:14 Ktlxnb OV(l) – Possible difference in
4QDeutk2 1 8 hktlxnb pronunciation.
Q731 MT Deut 20:8 Myr+#h SV(2) – 4QDeutk2 has a clarifying
4QDeutk2 2-3 3 My+pw#h plus.^1231
Q732 MT Deut 20:11 Kn(t OV(l) – Possible difference in
4QDeutk2 2-3 6 hkn(t pronunciation.
Q733 MT Deut 20:11 Kl OV(l) – Possible difference in
4QDeutk2 2-3 6 hkl pronunciation.
1229
Both Tg. Neof. and Tg. Ps.-J. read the plural pronominal suffix consistently in this verse. In the MT
there is no confusion over grammatical number, which is treated consistently as singular throughout the
passage. The SP and the LXX support the reading in the MT. 1230
1231 See Q638 above, and the comments in note.
The form in 4QDeutk2 either replaces the term Myr+#h, “the officials,” in the MT, or is an additional
term, although the lack of conjunction preceding the term would seem to argue against the latter. The two
terms are not synonymous, as can be seen from Jos 8:33, 1 Chron 23:4 and 1 Chron 26:29, but the fact that
the terms occur in close proximity in these passages may have prompted the addition of the second term in
4QDeutk2.