When the cold-air-standard assumptions are utilized, it reduces to(9–24)A regenerator with a higher effectiveness obviously saves a greater
amount of fuel since it preheats the air to a higher temperature prior to com-
bustion. However, achieving a higher effectiveness requires the use of a
larger regenerator, which carries a higher price tag and causes a larger pres-
sure drop. Therefore, the use of a regenerator with a very high effectiveness
cannot be justified economically unless the savings from the fuel costs
exceed the additional expenses involved. The effectiveness of most regener-
ators used in practice is below 0.85.
Under the cold-air-standard assumptions, the thermal efficiency of an
ideal Brayton cycle with regeneration is(9–25)Therefore, the thermal efficiency of an ideal Brayton cycle with regenera-
tion depends on the ratio of the minimum to maximum temperatures as well
as the pressure ratio. The thermal efficiency is plotted in Fig. 9–40 for vari-
ous pressure ratios and minimum-to-maximum temperature ratios. This fig-
ure shows that regeneration is most effective at lower pressure ratios and
low minimum-to-maximum temperature ratios.hth,regen 1 aT 1
T 3b1rp 21 k^1 2>kPT 5 T 2
T 4 T 2516 | Thermodynamics
5101520250.70.60.50.40.30.20.1η th,BraytonPressure ratio, rpWith regenerationWithout regenerationT 1 /T 3 = 0.2
T 1 /T 3 = 0.25T 1 /T 3 = 0.33FIGURE 9–40
Thermal efficiency of the ideal
Brayton cycle with and without
regeneration.
35sT, K4 a1qregen = qsaved13003002 aqinFIGURE 9–41
T-sdiagram of the regenerative
Brayton cycle described in
Example 9–7.
EXAMPLE 9–7 Actual Gas-Turbine Cycle with RegenerationDetermine the thermal efficiency of the gas-turbine described in Example
9–6 if a regenerator having an effectiveness of 80 percent is installed.Solution The gas-turbine discussed in Example 9–6 is equipped with a
regenerator. For a specified effectiveness, the thermal efficiency is to be
determined.
Analysis The T-sdiagram of the cycle is shown in Fig. 9–41. We first deter-
mine the enthalpy of the air at the exit of the regenerator, using the defini-
tion of effectiveness:Thus,This represents a savings of 220.0 kJ/kg from the heat input requirements.
The addition of a regenerator (assumed to be frictionless) does not affect the
net work output. Thus,hthwnet
qin210.41 kJ>kg
570.60 kJ>kg0.369 or 36.9%qinh 3 h 5 1 1395.97825.37 2 kJ>kg570.60 kJ>kg0.801 h 5 605.39 2 kJ>kg
1 880.36605.39 2 kJ>kgSh 5 825.37 kJ>kgPh 5 h 2 a
h 4 ah 2 a