237 °C, which is too high as the minimum temperature in the cycle. Therefore,
the use of mercury as a working fluid is limited to the high-temperature
cycles. Other disadvantages of mercury are its toxicity and high cost. The
mass flow rate of mercury in binary vapor cycles is several times that of water
because of its low enthalpy of vaporization.
It is evident from the T-sdiagram in Fig. 10–26 that the binary vapor cycle
approximates the Carnot cycle more closely than the steam cycle for the
same temperature limits. Therefore, the thermal efficiency of a power plant
can be increased by switching to binary cycles. The use of mercury–water
binary cycles in the United States dates back to 1928. Several such plants
have been built since then in the New England area, where fuel costs are typ-
ically higher. A small (40-MW) mercury–steam power plant that was in ser-
vice in New Hampshire in 1950 had a higher thermal efficiency than most of
the large modern power plants in use at that time.
Studies show that thermal efficiencies of 50 percent or higher are possible
with binary vapor cycles. However, binary vapor cycles are not economically
attractive because of their high initial cost and the competition offered by the
combined gas–steam power plants.
588 | Thermodynamics
4
58
1
T
s
6
3
STEAM
CYCLE
MERCURY
CYCLE
MERCURY
CYCLE
Heat exchanger
STEAM
CYCLE
Steam
turbine
Condenser
Steam
pump
6
5
1
Mercury
turbine
4
Boiler
Mercury
pump
7
Q
2
7
Saturation
dome
(steam)
Saturation dome
(mercury)
23
Superheater
8
FIGURE 10–26
Mercury–water binary vapor cycle.