COGNITIVE CONSISTENCY THEORIESFazio, R. H., M. P. Zanna, and J. Cooper 1977 ‘‘Disso-
nance and Self-Perception: An Integrative View of
Each Theory’s Proper Domain of Application.’’ Jour-
nal of Experimental Social Psychology 13:464–479.
Festinger, L. 1957 A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Palo
Alto, Calif.: Stanford University Press.
———, and M. Carlsmith 1959 ‘‘Cognitive Consequences
of Forced Compliance.’’ Journal of Abnormal and
Social Psychology 58:203–210.
Fiske, S. T. 1982 ‘‘Schema-Triggered Affect: Applica-
tions to Social Perception.’’ In M. S. Clark and S. T.
Fiske, eds., Affect and Cognition. Hillsdale, N.J.:
Erlbaum.
Forgas, J. P. 1990 ‘‘Affect and Social Judgments: An
Introductory Review.’’ In J. P. Forgas, ed., Emotion
and Social Judgments. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
Frijda, N. H. 1988 ‘‘The Laws of Emotion.’’ American
Psychologist 43:349–358.
Hamilton, D. L. 1981 ‘‘Illusory Correlation as a Basis for
Stereotyping.’’ In D. L. Hamilton, ed., Cognitive Proc-
esses in Stereotyping and Intergroup Behavior. Hillsdale,
N.J.: Erlbaum.
Harary, F. 1983 ‘‘Consistency Theory is Alive and Well.’’
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 9:60–64.
Harman-Jones, E., J. Brehm, J. Greenberg, L. Simon,
and D. E. Nelson 1996 ‘‘Evidence that the Production
of Dissonance is Not Necessary to Create Cognitive
Dissonance.’’ Journal of Personality and Social Psycholo-
gy 70:5–16.
Heider, F. 1946 ‘‘Attitudes and Cognitive Organiza-
tions.’’ Journal of Psychology 21:107–112.
——— 1958 The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations.
Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.
Isen, A. M. 1987 ‘‘Positive Affect, Cognitive Processes,
and Social Behavior.’’ In L. Berkowitz, ed., Advances
in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 20. New York:
Academic Press.
Köhler, W. 1929 Gestalt Psychology. New York: Liveright.
Lewin, K. 1935 A Dynamic Theory of Personality. New
York: McGraw-Hill.
Lord, C. G. 1992 ‘‘Was Cognitive Dissonance Theory a
Mistake?’’ Psychological Inquiry 3 (4):339–342.
Miller, G. A. 1956 ‘‘The Magical Number Seven Plus or
Minus Two: Some Limits on Our Capacity for Proc-
essing Information.’’ Psychological Review 63:81–97.
Miller, N. E. 1944 ‘‘Experimental Studies of Conflict.’’
In J. Hunt, ed., Personality and the Behavioral Disorders,
Vol. 1. New York: Ronald Press.
Newcomb, T. M. 1953 ‘‘An Approach to the Study of
Communicative Acts.’’ Psychological Review 60:393–404.
——— 1968a ‘‘Introduction.’’ In R. P. Abelson, E.
Aronson, W. J. McGuire, T. M. Newcomb, M. J.
Rosenberg, and P. H. Tannenbaum, eds., Cognitive
Consistency Theories: A Sourcebook. Chicago, Ill.: Rand
McNally.
——— 1968b ‘‘Interpersonal Balance.’’ In R. P. Abelson,
E. Aronson, W. J.McGuire, T. M. Newcomb, M. J.
Rosenberg, and P. H. Tannenbaum, eds., Cognitive
Consistency Theories: A Sourcebook. Chicago, Ill.: Rand
McNally.
Ortony, A., G. L. Clore, and A. Collins 1988 The Cogni-
tive Structure of Emotions. New York: Cambridge Uni-
versity Press.
Osgood, C. E., and P. H. Tannenbaum 1955 ‘‘The
Principle of Congruity in the Prediction of Attitude
Change.’’ Psychological Review 62:42–55.
Rosenberg, M. J. 1956 ‘‘Cognitive Structure and Attitu-
dinal Affect.’’ Journal of Abnormal and Social Psycholo-
gy 53:367–372.
——— 1964 ‘‘A Structural Theory of Attitude Dynam-
ics.’’ In E. E. Sampson, ed., Approaches, Contexts, and
Problems of Social Psychology. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.:
Prentice-Hall.
——— 1968 ‘‘Hedonism, Inauthenticity, and Other
Goads Toward Expansion of a Consistency Theory.’’
In R. P. Abelson, E. Aronson, W. J. McGuire, T. M.
Newcomb, M. J. Rosenberg, and P. H. Tannenbaum,
eds., Cognitive Consistency Theories: A Sourcebook. Chi-
cago, Ill.: Rand McNally.
Schlenker, B. R. 1992 ‘‘Of Shape Shifters and Theories.’’
Psychological Inquiry 3 (4):342–344.
Schultz, T. R., and M. R. Lepper 1996 ‘‘Cognitive Disso-
nance Reduction as Constraint Satisfaction.’’Psycho-
logical Review 103 (2):219–240.
Schwarz, N. 1990 ‘‘Feelings as Information: Informa-
tional and Motivational Functions of Affective States.’’
In R. Sorrentino and E. T. Higgins, eds., Handbook of
Motivation and Cognition, Vol. 2. New York: Guilford.
Tannenbaum, P. H. 1968 ‘‘The Congruity Principle:
Retrospective Reflections and Recent Research.’’ In
R. P. Abelson, E. Aronson, W. J. McGuire, T. M.
Newcomb, M. J. Rosenberg, and P. H. Tannenbaum,
eds., Cognitive Consistency Theories: A Sourcebook.Chi-
cago, Ill.: Rand McNally.
Zanna, M. P., and J. Cooper 1976 ‘‘Dissonance and the
Attribution Process.’’ In J. H. Harvey, W. J. Ickes, and
R. F. Kidd, eds., New Directions in Attribution Research.
Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.
Zanna, M.P., and J. K. Rempel, 1988 ‘‘Attitudes: A New
Look at an Old Concept.’’ In D. Bar-Tal and A.