Encyclopedia of Sociology

(Marcin) #1
CRIME RATES

REFERENCES


Adams, Bert N. 1979 ‘‘Mate Selection in the United
States: A Theoretical Summarization.’’ In W. R. Burr,
R. Hill, F. I. Nye, and I. L. Reiss, eds., Contemporary
Theories About the Family. New York: Free Press.


Aronson, Elliot 1972 The Social Animal. New York:Viking.


Bailey, Beth L. 1988 From Front Porch to Back Seat:
Courtship in Twentieth Century America. Baltimore:
Johns Hopkins University Press.


Browne, Judy 1996 Dating for Dummies. Foster City,
Calif.: IDG Books.


Bulcroft, Kris, and Margaret O’Connor 1986 ‘‘The Im-
portance of Dating Relationships on Quality of Life
for Older Persons.’’ Family Relations 35:397–401.


Call, Vaughn, Susan Sprecher, and Pepper Schwartz
1995 ‘‘The Incidence and Frequency of Marital Sex
in a National Sample.’’ Journal of Marriage and the
Family 57:639–652.


Farber, Bernard 1964 Family Organization and Interac-
tion. San Francisco: Chandler.


Fein, Ellen, and Sherrie Schneider 1995 The Rules: Time-
Tested Secrets for Capturing the Heart of Mr. Right. New
York: Warner.


Frazier, Patricia, Nancy Arikian, Sonja Benson, Ann
Losoff, and Steven Maurer 1996 ‘‘Desire for Mar-
riage and Life Satisfaction among Unmarried Het-
erosexual Adults.’’ Journal of Social and Personal Rela-
tionships 13(2):225–239.


Frazier, Shervert H. 1994 ‘‘Psychotrends: What Kind of
People Are We Becoming?’’ Psychology Today Janu-
ary/February:32–37, 64, 66.


Goode, William J. 1969 ‘‘The Theoretical Importance of
Love.’’ American Sociological Review 34:38–47.


Gordon, Michael 1981 ‘‘Was Waller Ever Right? The
Rating and Dating Complex Reconsidered.’’ Journal
of Marriage and the Family 43:67–76.


Gray, John 1998 Mars and Venus on a Date. New York:
Harper-Collins.


Kirkpatrick, Clifford (1955) 1963 The Family as Process
and Institution, 2nd ed. New York: Ronald.


Kuriansky, Judy 1996 The Complete Idiot’s Guide to Dat-
ing. New York: Alpha Books.


Laner, Mary R. 1995 Dating: Delights, Discontents, and
Dilemmas. Salem, Wisc.: Sheffield.


Murstein, Bernard I. 1980 ‘‘Mate Selection in the 1970s.’’
Journal of Marriage and the Family 42:777–792.


Office of National Drug Control Policy 1998 ‘‘Fact
Sheet: Rohypnol.’’ Washington, D.C.: Drug Policy
Information Clearing House.


Popenoe, David 1987 ‘‘Beyond the Nuclear Family: A
Statistical Portrait of the Changing Family in Swe-
den.’’ Journal of Marriage and the Family 49:173–183.
Qian, Zhenchao 1998 ‘‘Changes in Assortative Mating:
The Impact of Age and Education, 1970–1990.’’
Demography 35(3):279–292.
Queen, Stuart A., Robert W. Habenstein, and Jill S.
Quadagno 1985 The Family in Various Cultures, 5th
ed. New York: Harper and Row.
Ramu, G. N. 1989 ‘‘Patterns in Mate Selection.’’ In K.
Ishwaran, ed., Family and Marriage: Cross-Cultural
Perspectives. Toronto: Wall and Thompson.
Rothman, Ellen K. 1984 Hands and Hearts: A History of
Courtship in America. New York: Basic Books.
Schur, Edwin M. 1988 The Americanization of Sex. Phila-
delphia: Temple University Press.
Stein, Peter J. (ed.) 1981 Single Life: Unmarried Adults in
Social Context. New York: St. Martin’s.
Stephen, Timothy D. 1985 ‘‘Fixed-Sequence and Circu-
lar-Causal Models of Relationship Development: Di-
vergent Views on the Role of Communication in
Intimacy.’’ Journal of Marriage and the Family 47:955–963.
Thornton, Arland 1989 ‘‘Changing Attitudes toward
Family Issues in the United States.’’ Journal of Mar-
riage and Family 51:873–893.
U.S. Bureau of the Census 1992 Statistical Brief 92–13,
Family Life Today... and How It Has Changed.
Ventura, S. J., T. J. Matthews, and S. C. Curtin 1998
‘‘Declines in Teenage Birth Rates, 1991–97; National
and State Patterns.’’ National Vital Statistics Reports
47(12). Hyattsville, Md: National Center for Health
Statistics.
Waller, Willard 1938 ‘‘The Rating and Dating Com-
plex.’’ American Sociological Review 2:727–734.
———, and Reuben Hill 1951 The Family: A Dynamic
Interpretation, rev. ed. New York: Dryden.

MARY REIGE LANER

CRIME DETERRENCE


See Criminal Sanctions; Criminology; Social
Control.

CRIME RATES


The interpretation of crime rates seems unprob-
lematic, but those sociologists who study crime
know that is not the case. Even simple counts of
Free download pdf