DECISION-MAKING THEORY AND RESEARCHmaking (e.g., Bell 1982), but this topic deserves
more attention. These questions, as well as the
issues discussed above, will make decision theory
and research an area of continued interest and
relevance.
REFERENCES
Ajzen, I. 1996 ‘‘The Social Psychology of Decision Mak-
ing.’’ In E. T. Higgins and A. W. Kruglanski, Social
Psychology: Handbook of Basic Principles. New York:
Guilford.
Arkes, H. R., R. Dawes, and C. Christensen 1986 ‘‘Fac-
tors Influencing the Use of a Decision Rule in a
Probabilistic Task.’’ Organizational Behavior and Hu-
man Decision Making, 37:93–110.
Axelrod, R. 1984 The Evolution of Cooperation. New York:
Basic Books.
Baron, J. 1994 Thinking And Deciding, 2d ed. Cam-
bridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
——— 1997 ‘‘Biases in the Quantitative Measurement
of Values for Public Decisions.’’ Psychological Bulletin
122:72–88.
——— 1998 Judgment Misguided: Intuition and Error in
Public Decision Making. Oxford: Oxford Universi-
ty Press.
Bayes, T. (1764) 1958 ‘‘An Essay Towards Solving a
Problem in the Doctrine of Chances.’’ Biometrika
45:293–315.
Bell, D. 1982 ‘‘Regret in Decision Making Under Uncer-
tainty.’’ Operations Research 30:961–981.
Birnbaum, M. H. 1983 ‘‘Base Rates in Bayesian Infer-
ence: Signal Detection Analysis of the Cab Problem.’’
American Journal of Psychology 96:85–94.
Birnbaum, M. H., G. Coffey, B. A. Mellers, and R. Weiss
1992 ‘‘Utility Measurement: Configural-Weight Theo-
ry and the Judge’s Point of View.’’ Journal of Experi-
mental Psychology: Human Perception And Performance
18:331–346.
Birnbaum, M. H., and W. R. Mcintosh 1996 ‘‘Violations
of Branch Independence in Choices Between Gam-
bles.’’ Organizational Behavior And Human Decision
Processes 67:91–110.
Blount, S., and M. H. Bazerman 1996 ‘‘The Inconsistent
Evaluation of Absolute Versus Comparative Payoffs
in Labor Supply and Bargaining.’’ Journal of Economic
Behavior and Organization 30:227–240.
Brehmer, B. 1990 ‘‘Strategies in Real-Time, Dynamic
Decision Making.’’ In R. M. Hogarth, ed., Insights in
Decision Making: A Tribute To Hillel J. Einhorn 262–- Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Brunswick, E. 1952 The Conceptual Framework of Psycholo-
gy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Busemeyer, J., D. L. Medin, and R. Hastie 1995 Decision
Making From a Cognitive Perspective. San Diego:
Academic.
———, and J. T. Townsend 1993 ‘‘Decision-Field Theo-
ry: A Dynamic-Cognitive Approach to Decision-Mak-
ing in an Uncertain Environment.’’ Psychological Re-
view 100:432–459.
Chase, V. M., R. Hertwig, and G. Gigerenzer 1998
‘‘Visions of Rationality.’’ Trends in Cognitive Sciences,
2:206–214.
Clore, G. L., N. Schwarz, and M. Conway 1994 ‘‘Affec-
tive Causes and Consequences of Social Information
Processing.’’ In R. S. Wyer and T. K. Srull, eds.,
Handbook of Social Cognition: 2nd Edition. Hillsdale,
N.J.: Erlbaum.
Dawes, R. M. 1979 ‘‘The Robust Beauty of Improper
Linear Models.’’ American Psychologist 34:571–582.
——— 1998 ‘‘Behavioral Decision Making and Judg-
ment.’’ In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, and G. Lindzey,
eds., The Handbook of Social Psychology, 4th ed. Bos-
ton: Mcgraw-Hill.
Diehl, E., and J. D. Sterman 1995 ‘‘Effects of Feedback
Complexity on Dynamic Decision Making.’’ Organi-
zational Behavior and Human Decision Processes
62:198–215.
Dougherty, M. R. P., C. F. Gettys, and E. E. Ogden (in
press) ‘‘MINERVA-DM: A Memory Processes Model
for Judgments of Likelihood.’’ Psychological Review
106:180–209.
Einhorn, H. J. 1972 ‘‘Expert Measurement and Me-
chanical Combination.’’ Organizational Behavior and
Human Performance 13:171–192.
Fischer, G. W., and S. A. Hawkins 1993 ‘‘Strategy Com-
patibility, Scale Compatibility, and the Prominence
Effect.’’ Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human
Perception and Performance 19:580–597.
Fong, G. T., D. H. Krantz, and R. E. Nisbett 1986 ‘‘The
Effects of Statistical Training on Thinking About
Everyday Problems.’’ Cognitive Psychology 18:253–292.
Gigerenzer, G., and U. Hoffrage 1995 ‘‘How to Improve
Bayesian Reasoning without Instruction: Frequency
Formats.’’ Psychological Review 102:684–704.