Ch. 3: Auctions in Corporate Finance 141
Dasgupta, S., Tsui, K., 2003. A “matching auction” for targets with heterogeneous bidders. Journal of Finan-
cial Intermediation 12, 331–364.
Dasgupta, S., Tsui, K., 2004. Auction with cross-shareholdings. Economic Theory 24, 163–194.
Degeorge, F., Derrien, F., Womack, K.L., 2004. Quid pro quo in IPOs: Why book-building is dominating
auctions. Working Paper, University of Lugano; University of Toronto; Dartmouth College.
DeMarzo, P.M., Kremer, I., Skrzypacz, A., 2005. Bidding with securities: Auctions and security design. Amer-
ican Economic Review 95, 936–959.
Easterbrook, F.H., 1990. Is corporate bankruptcy efficient? Journal of Financial Economics 27, 411–417.
Eckbo, B.E., Giammarino, R., Heinkel, R., 1990. Asymmetric information and medium of exchange in
takeovers: Theory and tests. Review of Financial Studies 3, 651–675.
Eckbo, B.E., Thorburn, K.S., 2000. Gains to bidder firms revisited: Domestic and foreign acquisitions in
Canada. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 35, 1–25.
Eckbo, B.E., Thorburn, K.S., 2003. Control benefit and CEO discipline in automatic bankruptcy auctions.
Journal of Financial Economics 69, 227–258.
Eckbo, B.E., Thorburn, K.S., 2005. Bidding in mandatory bankruptcy auctions: Theory and evidence. Work-
ing Paper.
Fishman, M.J., 1988. A theory of pre-emptive takeover bidding. RAND Journal of Economics 19, 88–101.
Fishman, M.J., 1989. Preemptive bidding and the role of the medium of exchange in acquisitions. Journal of
Finance 44, 41–57.
French, K.R., McCormick, R.E., 1984. Sealed bids, sunk costs, and the process of competition. Journal of
Business 57, 417–441.
Gal-Or, E., 1985. First mover and second mover advantages. International Economic Review, 649–653.
Gal-Or, E., 1987. First mover disadvantages with private information. Review of Economic Studies, 279–292.
Gilson, S.C., 1997. Transactions costs and capital structure choise: Evidence from financially distressed firms.
Journal of Finance 52, 161–196.
Grossman, S., Hart, O., 1980. Disclosure laws and takeover bids. Journal of Finance 35, 323–334.
Hansen, R.G., 1985a. Empirical testing of auction theory. American Economic Review 75, 156–159.
Hansen, R.G., 1985b. Auction with contingent payments. American Economic Review 75, 862–865.
Hansen, R.G., 1986. Sealed bid versus open auctions: The evidence. Economic Inquiry 24, 125–142.
Hansen, R.G., 2001. Auction of companies. Economic Inquiry 39, 30–43.
Hansen, R.G., Thomas, R.S., 1998. Auctions in bankruptcy: Theoretical analysis and practical guidance.
International Review of Law and Economics 18, 159–185.
Harris, M., Raviv, A., 1981. Allocation mechanisms and the design of auctions. Econometrica 49, 1477–1499.
Hart, O., LaPorta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Moore, J., 1997. A new bankruptcy procedure that uses multiple
auctions. European Economic Review 41, 461–473.
Hartzell, J., Ofek, E., Yermack, D., 2004. What’s in it for me? CEOs whose firms are acquired. Review of
Financial Studies 17, 37–61.
Hausch, D.B., Seward, J.K., 1993. Signalling with dividends and share repurchases: A choice between deter-
ministic and stochastic cash disbursements. Review of Financial Studies 6, 121–154.
Hendricks, R., Porter, R., 1988. An empirical study of an auction with asymmetric information. American
Economic Review 78, 865–883.
Hendricks, K., Porter, R., 1992. Joint bidding in the federal OCS auctions. American Economic Review 82,
506–511.
Herzel, L., Shepro, W., 1990. Bidders and Targets: Mergers and Acquisitions in the U.S. Blackwell, Cam-
bridge, MA.
Hirshleifer, J., 1971. The private and social value of information and the reward to inventive activity. American
Economic Review 61, 561–574.
Holmstrom, B., Kaplan, S.N., 2001. Corporate governance and merger activity in the United States: Making
sense of the 1980s and 1990s. Journal of Economic Perspectives 15, 121–144.
Jagannathan, R., Sherman, A., 2006. Why do IPO auctions fail? NBER Working Paper.
Jarrell, G.A., Brikley, J.A., Netter, J.M., 1988. The market for corporate control: The empirical evidence since
- Journal of Economic Prospectives 2 (1), 49–68.