Engineering Rock Mechanics

(Jacob Rumans) #1
138 Rock masses: deformabilify, strength and failure

for the strength parameters of fracture set B to find


c^ = [OS x 0.0 + (1 - 0.5) x 16.31 = 8.15 MPa


and
tan3 = [OS x tan35 + (1 - 0.5) x tan431 = 0.8164 + f = 39.2"
Having now found the appropriate strength parameters for the inter-
mittent fracture set, the analysis proceeds as in A8.6 and A8.7 with the
results shown below.

Inclination ot discontinuity normal to major Fracture set A:
principal axis CA = 100kPaandf#A = 20
120

p 80
60

aJ

0 30 60 90
Inclination of discontinuity normal to major Fracture set B:
principal axis i? = 8.15 MPa and f = 39.2"

These diagrams are for each set in isolation. In the rock mass we have
& = 45" when PA = O", and so, using set A as the reference, a -45"
shift must be applied to 6 to bring the two sets to a common co-ordinate
system. The resulting plot is as shown on the next page with the heavier
line indicating the composite rock mass strength.
Note that in the second and fourth quadrants, i.e. 90-180" and 270-
360", the strength of the rock mass is only controlled by set A.

8.3 Additional points


We have emphasized that the fractures are the dominant feature gov-
erning rock mass behaviour. These fractures dominate the rock mass
geometry, deformation modulus, strength, failure behaviour, permeabil-
ity, and even the local magnitudes and directions of the in situ stress field.
There is, however, considerable complexity inherent in the geometrical
and mechanical properties of rock mass fracture systems, which should
be taken into account in direct modelling of the specific fractures. For
Free download pdf