52 Business TheEconomistDecember18th 2021
Informationtechnology
Cloud atlas
H
ow muchhave you spent on the cloud
today? It takes Robert Hodges only a
few clicks to find out. He pulls up a dash
board on a computer in his home office in
Berkeley, California, which shows cloud
spending at his database firm, Altinity, in
real time. The cloud represents half of Al
tinity’s total costs.
Mr Hodges’s widget is a window onto
the future. As bills soar, every firm of any
size will need to understand not just the
benefits of the cloud, but also its costs.
Gartner, a consultancy, calculates that
spending on publiccloud services will
reach nearly 10% of all corporate spending
on information technology (it) in 2021, up
from around 4% in 2017. Plenty of techno
phile startups spend 80% of their revenues
on cloud services, estimate Sarah Wang
and Martin Casado of Andreessen Horo
witz, a venturecapital firm. The situation
is analogous to a century ago, when elec
tric power became an essential input (and
prompted some firms to hire another kind
of ceo: the chief electricity officer).
For cloud companies this has been a bo
nanza. Giants of the industry, such as Ama
zon Web Services (aws), Microsoft Azure,
Google Cloud Platform (gcp) and, in China,
Alibaba and Tencent, have been adding
business briskly. Gartner expects global
sales of cloud services to rise by 26% in
2021, to more than $400bn. But competi
tion is stirring. On December 9th Oracle, a
big softwaremaker, reported higher rev
enue than expected, mainly thanks to the
rapid growth of its cloud unit. Its market
value shot up by over 15%, or nearly $40bn.
And a welkin of companies is emerging to
help businesses manage their computing
loads. One such firm, Snowflake, is worth
$108bn. Another, HashiCorp, went public
in New York on December 8th and now
boasts a stockmarket value of $15bn, three
times its last private valuation in 2020.
The latest cloud formation and the
winds shaping it were on full display this
month at Re:Invent, the world’s largest
cloudcomputing conference, held every
year in Las Vegas by aws. Panels discussing
“cost optimisation” and “awsbilling” were
among the best attended. The accompany
ing expo featured booths where startups
with names such as CloudFix, Cloudwiry
and Zesty were offering to help customers
manage their cloud use.
Businesses’ main motive for moving to
the cloud was never about cost but “scala
bility”: having access to additional com
puting resources with a few clicks. But
cloud bills have grown more complicated
as well as higher, sometimes rivalling
those from America’s notoriously opaque
healthcare providers. The awsbill of even
a small customer like the Duckbill Group,
another costconsulting firm, can run to
more than 30 pages, listing in detail the
cost of every single service it has used,
from bandwidth in India ($0.01 per request
to its website) to a virtual server in Oregon
($83.59 for “Amazon Elastic Compute
Cloud” running opensource software).
That is only natural, says Corey Quinn,
cofounder of the Duckbill Group. Big
cloud providers such as aws, Azure and
gcpare amalgamations of dozens of ser
vices. awssells more than 200, ranging
from simple storage and numbercrunch
ing to all sorts of specialised databases and
artificialintelligence offerings. Each is
billedaccordingtomultipledimensions,
includingthenumberofservers,timeused
orbytestransferred.Thencomethedis
countsandspecialoffers.
MsWangandMrCasadohavesuggested
that firms should think about building
their own private clouds to keep costs
down.Sofarfewfirmshaveoptedforsuch
“repatriation”, which isboth pricey and
makesit harderforbusinessestoenjoythe
benefitsofessentiallyunlimitedcomput
ingresourcesinthepubliccloud.Rather,
businesses are trying to professionalise
their“cloudfinancialoperations”(orFin
Opsinthecompulsorytechshorthand),for
exampletyingbonusesofexecutives re
sponsibleforcloudusagetocostcontrol.
Forthetimebeing,gaugingthecloud’s
financial impact is an arduousmanual
process.Ascloudusegrows,itwillneedto
beautomated,saysLydiaLeongofGartner.
Somewillprobablybeoutsourcedtoup
startsofthesortthrongingRe:Invent.A
numbersella mixofconsultingandsoft
waretoolstoassessclouduseandofferad
vice on how to lower costs. CloudFix,
whichunveiled itsservice inLasVegas,
chargesa subscriptiontoruna customer’s
configurationthroughsoftwarethatopti
misestheclient’scloudperformance.
The big cloudcompanies havetaken
note,bothoftheupstartsandofthegrow
ingcustomergrumbles.JustbeforetheLas
Vegaseventawsannouncedthatitwould
startcharginglessfordatatransferstothe
internet,loweringthebillsofmillionsof
customers.Italsohelpsthemidentifysav
ings, forinstance by offering a“Simple
MonthlyCalculator”(thoughitlooksrath
er complex and sports a web interface
straightoutofthelate1990s).
At Microsoft, Azure cloud costs are of
ten rolled into the “enterprise agree
ments”, allencompassing subscriptions
that big companies typically sign up to.
gcp, being the smallest of the top three,
“strongly believes” in the “multicloud”,
says Amit Zavery, a senior executive. In
other words, it aims to enable customers to
choose the best and cheapest cloud servic
es from different providers (thus making it
easier for them to pick Google).
Costly, with a chance of discounts
Yet the big providers are not making life
easier for customers everywhere. Having
customers pay only for the itthey use,
while combining different services as
needed, is the whole point of cloud com
puting. At awsthe complexity is seen as a
competitive advantage. Its assortment of
services is mostly created by independent
teams that can innovate faster (including
by changing how clients are charged). “We
decided to let our developers build what
they build—and unleash their creativity,”
says Matt Garman, who heads sales and
marketing at aws.
L AS VEGAS
The battle of the computing clouds intensifies—andthebattlefieldgrows
more complex
Clouds in the stratosphere
Global public-cloud spending
Source:Gartner
12
9
6
3
0
22212019182017
Publiccloudas%oftotalITspending
FORECAST
500
400
300
200
100
0
22212019182017
By type, $bn
Managementandsecurity
Platformservices Businessprocesses
Web-based applications Infrastructure hardware
FORECAST
CorrectionIn “The great reallocation” (December
11th) we mixed up the chart scale. The value of
Chinese assets held by foreign entities is measured
in trillions of yuan, not tens of trillions. Sorry