18/25 December 2021 | New Scientist | 9
GOVERNMENTS met in Jamaica
last week to decide on the path
towards a controversial new era
of commercial deep-sea mining.
Advocates say tapping mineral-
rich, potato-sized nodules on the
ocean floor will be essential to
meet the rising global demand for
metals in electric cars and other
low-carbon technologies, claiming
it would cause less environmental
harm than land-based mining.
Critics say it will be devastating for
marine life and habitats, and would
happen alongside conventional
mining rather than displacing it.
The UN regulator on the
issue, the International Seabed
Authority (ISA), has awarded more
than 20 contracts for deep-sea
mining research. But progress
on rules for commercial mining,
known as the mining code, has
been slow since talks began in
- That changed in July,
when the Pacific island of
Nauru forced the issue.
In partnership with a Canadian
mining firm, The Metals Company,
Nauru invoked a clause under a
UN treaty that triggers a “two-year
rule”. It effectively means the
ISA must draw up the mining
code by 9 July 2023, at which
point entities can obtain licences
to start commercial exploitation.
The Metals Company told
investors that it hopes to start
“small-scale production” in 2024,
across the Pacific seabed between
Hawaii and Mexico.
Governments agreed a road
map on 10 December that sets out
meeting dates to work on the
mining code throughout next
year, starting in February. One
meeting scheduled to start in
October will discuss a “what if ”
scenario if it looks like there could
be no rules agreed by July 2023.
Helen Scales, a marine
biologist and author, says two
years isn’t long enough to draw up
a robust code. She wants to see a
moratorium on deep-sea mining.
“Nobody knows with any kind of
certainty how we could go ahead
extracting and exploiting these
deposits in the deep sea without
environmental harm,” she says.
“All of the science we have so far
is pointing towards significant
long-term and largely irreversible
damage.” This could stem directly
from machines extracting nodules
and from plumes of sediment
generated by mining.
The Metals Company has
conceded to investors that
“it’s impossible to guarantee
zero loss of biodiversity” from its
operations, because of imperfect
baseline surveys of “wonderful
and fascinating creatures”.
There are sticking points on
the regulations that go beyond
environmental concerns. One big
issue is the size of royalties from
commercial mining owed to all
167 of the ISA’s member countries,
given that seabeds outside of
national waters are considered
a “global commons” for the
world. Another sensitive issue is
compensation. A group of African
countries has said it wants rules
on compensation for any losses
faced by land-based miners
within their borders.
There is one more hurdle
that could trip up the start of
commercial deep-sea mining:
whether private sector firms
can finance the first projects.
Since being listed on the NASDAQ
stock exchange in September,
The Metals Company’s share
price has fallen from around $
to about $2, and it has failed to
attract as much investment as it
hoped. The firm didn’t respond
to a request for comment. ❚
Environment
Adam Vaughan
NO
AA
OF
FIC
E^ O
F^ O
CE
AN
EX
PL
OR
ATI
ON
Race to start commercial deep-sea
mining endangers ecosystems
Manganese nodules on
the floor of the central
Pacific basin
Animal behaviour
THE feather colours of certain
kinds of turkeys can predict how
they will cope with life on the farm.
Raised for their meat and eggs,
domesticated turkeys (Meleagris
gallopavo) in Nigeria are born with
either black, white or lavender –
also called bronze – plumes.
Samuel Durosaro at the Federal
University of Agriculture, Abeokuta,
in Nigeria, and his colleagues
ran fearfulness tests on 75 turkey
chicks. The animals all came
from the same genetic line and
included 13 males and 12 females
of each colour.
For some fearfulness tests – in
which, for instance, the birds were
held upside down by their legs
and the amount they flapped their
wings was recorded – plumage
and leg colour didn’t seem to
make any difference.
However, for one test – in which
birds were placed in a dark box
with one small exit hole – the black
turkeys were five times as fast as
the white and lavender birds to
escape. This suggests that black
birds are bolder and less fearful,
says Durosaro.
And in another test, in which
the researchers placed the birds
one by one in a large open box, the
black turkeys showed boldness by
exploring more regions of the box
than the lavender turkeys. White
turkeys explored slightly more
than either black or lavender birds.
But, overall, black birds appeared
to be the boldest, and attempted
to escape from the box seven
times more often than other
birds (Applied Animal Behaviour
Science, doi.org/g8v8).
The differences may be related
to accidental side effects of
domestication in combination
with genetics, says Durosaro, and
could guide farmers to customise
their management techniques
to the particular needs of the
differently coloured turkeys. ❚
Turkey plumage
colour correlates
with bird fearfulness
Christa Lesté-Lasserre
YV
ES
LA
NC
EA
U/N
AT
UR
EP
L
A turkey
(Meleagris
gallopavo) with
black plumage
“ All of the science we have
so far is pointing towards
long-term and largely
irreversible damage”