Vol
August 2
due to th
IPR2014
In this de
informati
itself. Un
the relief
Here, Pet
the prior
declaratio
exclusive
Declarati
three-lev
incorpora
Petitione
The Boar
of citatio
made in t
petitions
Argumen
pursuant
lumino
2 8, 2014 – In
e Petitioner’
-00491 – Fid
ecision deny
ion containe
nder 37 C.F.R
f requested, i
titioner subm
art teaches o
on containin
ely to a 1,00
ion as Exhib
vel incorpora
ating the cla
r impermiss
rd ruled that
ons to the ref
the ... Decla
.” The Board
nts made in a
to 37 C.F.R
us Dec
n a decision o
’s excessive
delity Nation
ing institutio
ed in a suppo
R. § 42.22(a
including a d
mitted a claim
or suggests e
ng 1,278 para
3 page, sing
bit A.” The c
ation techniq
im chart, and
ibly sought t
the “petition
ferences them
aration into t
d refused to
a supporting
R. § 42.6(a)( 3
claratio
IPR
By Chris
of interest, th
reliance on
nal Informat
on of an inte
orting declara
a)(2) a petitio
detailed expl
m-by-claim
each elemen
agraphs. In t
le-spaced, cl
claim chart th
que – the peti
d the claim c
to greatly ex
n’s extensiv
mselves amo
the Petition,
consider the
g document m
3 ).
on Lead
R Petitio
topher L. M
he PTAB de
a voluminou
tion Services
er partes rev
ation, but no
on must incl
lanation of th
analysis for
t of the claim
those paragra
laim chart in
hen cites to t
ition incorpo
chart incorpo
xpand its arg
e reliance on
ounts to an in
thereby circ
e information
may not be in
ds to P
on
McKee
enied institut
us supporting
s, Inc. v. Dat
iew, the Boa
ot sufficientl
lude a “full s
he significan
nine ground
m. Petitioner
aphs, the dec
n landscape f
the reference
orating the d
orating from
guments in su
n citations to
ncorporation
cumventing t
n found only
ncorporated
TAB D
tion of inter
g declaration
tatreasury C
ard refused t
ly presented
statement of
nce of the ev
ds of unpaten
r chiefly cite
clarant point
format appe
es themselve
declaration, t
m the referen
upport of the
o the ... Dec
n by referenc
the page lim
y in the decla
by referenc
Denial o
partes revie
n:
Corp. (Paper
to consider
in the petitio
fthe reasons
vidence....”
ntability, alle
es to a 287 p
ts “almost
nded to [the
es. Through
the declaratio
nces – the
e petition.
claration in li
ce of argume
mits that appl
aration.
e into a petit
of
ew
9)
on
for
eging
age
e]
this
on
ieu
ents
y to
tion,