“People should be able to follow it quite easily,” he said. “It's back to business as usual.”The patent-in-suit is U.S. Patent Number 6,108,703.Limelight is represented by Aaron Panner, John Christopher Rozendaal, Gregory Rapawy
and Michael Joffre of Kellogg Huber Hansen Todd Evans & Figel PLLC, Alexander MacKinnon
of Kirkland & Ellis LLP and in-house counsel Dion Messer.Akamai and co-petitioner Massachusetts Institute of Technology are represented by Seth
Waxman, Thomas Saunders, Thomas Sprankling, Mark Fleming, Lauren Fletcher, Brook
Hopkins and Eric Fletcher of WilmerHale, Donald Dunner, Kara Stoll and Jennifer Swan of
Finnegan Henderson Farabow Garrett & Dunner LLP, Robert Frank Jr. and Carlos Perez-
Albuerne of Choate Hall & Stewart LLP and David Judson of the Law Office of David H.
Judson.The case is Limelight Networks Inc. v. Akamai Technologies Inc. et al., case number 12-
786, in the U.S. Supreme Court.--Additional reporting by Ryan Davis. Editing by Jeremy Barker and Richard McVay..
All Content © 2003-2014, Portfolio Media, Inc.Inducement Ruling Invites Multiparty-Infringement Review - Law360 Page 3 of 3
http://www.law360.com/articles/543631/print?section=ip 6 / 3 / 2014