Basic Marketing: A Global Managerial Approach

(Nandana) #1

Perreault−McCarthy: Basic
Marketing: A
Global−Managerial
Approach, 14/e



  1. Advertising and Sales
    Promotion


Text © The McGraw−Hill
Companies, 2002

Advertising and Sales Promotion 473

policies and want the rest of the European Union to adopt them. In Switzerland,
an advertiser cannot use an actor to represent a consumer. New Zealand and
Switzerland limit political ads on TV. In the United States, print ads must be iden-
tified so they aren’t confused with editorial matter; in other countries ads and
editorial copy can be intermixed. Most countries limit the number and length of
commercials on broadcast media. Until recently, an Italian TV ad could be shown
only 10 times a year.
What is seen as positioning in one country may be viewed as unfair or decep-
tive in another. For example, when Pepsi was advertising its cola as “the choice of
the new generation” in most countries, Japan’s Fair Trade Committee didn’t allow
it—because in Japan Pepsi was not “the choice.” Similarly, Hungary’s Economic
Competition Council fined Unilever $25,000 for running an ad that claimed that
its OMO detergent removed stains better than ordinary detergent. The Council
said the ad was unfair because Hungarian consumers would interpret the phrase
“ordinary detergent” as a reference to a locally produced detergent.^28
Differences in rules mean that a marketing manager may face very specific limits
in different countries, and local experts may be required to ensure that a firm doesn’t
waste money developing advertising programs that will never be shown or which
consumers will think are deceptive.

In the United States, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has the power to
control unfair or deceptive business practices—including deceptive advertising.
The FTC has been policing deceptive advertising for many years. And it may be
getting results now that advertising agencies as well as advertisers must share equal
responsibility for false, misleading, or unfair ads.
This is a serious matter. If the FTC decides that a particular practice is unfair or
deceptive, it has the power to require affirmative disclosures—such as the health
warnings on cigarettes—or corrective advertising—ads to correct deceptive
advertising. Years ago the FTC forced Listerine to spend millions of dollars on adver-
tising to “correct” earlier ads that claimed the mouthwash helped prevent colds.
Advertisers still remember that lesson. The possibility of large financial penalties
and/or the need to pay for corrective ads has caused more agencies and advertisers
to stay well within the law. That may explain why Microsoft quickly settled when
the FTC charged the firm with deceptive advertising concerning WebTV.^29

There are specialized advertising
agencies that help advertisers
with unique media—ranging from
posters that cover a whole
building to advertising messages
pressed into the sand on public
beaches.

FTC controls unfair
practices in the United
States
Free download pdf