Table 2.3 Values of t for various levels of probabilityDegrees of freedomConfidence level (%)
80 90 95 99 99.9
1 3.08 6.31 12.7 63.7 6372 1.89 2.92 4.30 9.92 31.63 1.64 2.35 3.18 5.84 12.9
4 1.53 2.13 2.78 4.60 8.605 1.48 2.02 2.57 4.03 6.866 1.44 1.94 2.45 3.71 5.967 1.42 1.90 2.36 3.50 5.408 1.40 1.86 2.31 3.36 5.049 1.38 1.83 2.26 3.25 4.7810 1.37 1.81 2.23 3.17 4.5911 1.36 1.80 2.20 3.11 4.4412 1.36 1.78 2.18 3.06 4.32
13 1.35 1.77 2.16 3.01 4.2214 1.34 1.76 2.14 2.98 4.14∞ 1.29 1.64 1.96 2.58 3.29are used in evaluating t.) The essential conclusion, here, is that five analyses at most are required to get a
reasonable estimate of the true mean.
When a comparison of two separate replicate sets of data is required, the first stage is normally to
compare their respective precisions by means of the F-test. This test uses the ratio of the variances of the
two sets to establish any statistically significant difference in precision. F is calculated from
(By convention the larger variance is always taken as numerator.) The value of F thus obtained is
compared with critical values computed on the assumption that they will be exceeded purely on a
probability basis in only 5% of cases (Table 2.4). When the experimental value of F exceeds the critical
value then the difference in variance or precision is deemed to be statistically significant.
Table 2.4 Critical values for F at the 5% levelDegrees of freedom
(denominator)Degrees of freedom (numerator)(^34561220) ∞
3 9.28 9.12 9.01 8.94 8.74 8.64 8.53
4 6.59 6.39 6.26 6.16 5.91 5.80 5.63