MEDICINE AND PHILOSOPHY IN CLASSICAL ANTIQUITY

(Ron) #1
126 Hippocratic Corpus and Diocles of Carystus

categorical difference, and the cause for mental disorders is virtually always

sought in bodily factors.

Mental faculties are given a more independent role in the Hippocratic

writingOn the Sacred Disease, in which the function of the brain is char-

acterised as ‘interpreting’ (hermeneus ̄ ) what is derived from the air outside.

This is in many respects a key text, not least because of the author’s polemic

stance to rival views:

For these reasons I believe that the brain is the most powerful part in a human


being. So long as it is healthy, it is the interpreter of what comes to the body from


the air. Consciousness is provided by the air. The eyes, ears, tongue, hands and


feet carry out what the brain knows, for throughout the body there is a degree
of consciousness proportionate to the amount of air which it receives. As far as


understanding is concerned, the brain is also the part that transmits this, for when


a man draws in a breath it first arrives at the brain, and from there it is distributed


over the rest of the body, having left behind in the brain its best portion and


whatever contains consciousness and thought. For if the air went first to the body


and subsequently to the brain, the power of discerning thinking would be left to


the flesh and to the blood vessels; it would reach the brain in a hot and no longer


pure state but mixed with moisture from the flesh and from the blood so that it


would no longer be accurate. I therefore state that the brain is the interpreter of


consciousness.


The diaphragm (phrenes), however, does not have the right name, but it has


got this by chance and through convention. I do not know in virtue of what


the diaphragm can think and have consciousness (phronein), except that if a man


suddenly feels pleasure or pain, the diaphragm leaps up and causes throbbing,


because it is thin and under greater tension than any other part of the body, and


it has no cavity into which it might receive anything good or bad that comes


upon it, but because of the weakness of its structure it is subject to disturbance


by either of these forces, since it does not perceive faster than any other part


of the body. Rather, it has its name and reputation for no good reason, just


as parts of the heart are called auricles though they make no contribution to


hearing.


Some say that we owe our consciousness to our hearts and that it is the heart


which suffers pain and feels anxiety. But this is not the case; rather, it is torn just


like the diaphragm, and even more than that for the same reasons: for blood vessels
from all parts of the body run to the heart, and it encapsulates these, so that it can


feel if any pain or tension occurs in a human being. Moreover, it is necessary for the


body to shudder and to contract when it feels pain, and when it is overwhelmed by


joy it experiences the same. This is why the heart and the diaphragm are particularly


sensitive. Yet neither of these parts has any share in consciousness; rather, it is the


brain which is responsible for all these. ( 16 – 17 [ 6. 390 – 4 L.])^15


(^15) Translation Jones in Jones and Withington ( 1923 – 31 ) vol.i, modified; section divisions according to
Grensemann.

Free download pdf