MEDICINE AND PHILOSOPHY IN CLASSICAL ANTIQUITY

(Ron) #1
288 Late antiquity

some drugs work ‘in virtue of their whole essence’ (’# %

(), others in virtue of one, or several particular qualities (warm,

cold, dry or wet); and some drugs admit of both possibilities depend-

ing on the circumstances;^33

the effect of a drug depends on the way of consumption: it makes all

the difference whether a substance (for example, mustard) is brought

onto the skin or taken in via the mouth;^34

a very fundamental distinction is whether a particular power such as

hotness is present in the foodstuff ‘primarily and by itself ’ ()

 ’7!) or ‘accidentally’ (1  < <#!): thus water is by

itself cold (i.e. cooling), but it may be accidentally warm (i.e. warm-

ing), because it has acquired its warmth (#vs.- 

  ).^35

Further distinctions mentioned are:

whether a certain substance acts as a foodstuff (which just preserves

the state of the body), or as a drug (which changes the state of the

body in a beneficial way), or a poison (which harms the state of the

body);^36

the distinction between the power a substance has ‘in itself ’ versus the

power ‘it is said to have in relation to something’ (3 ^  

),


and, within that latter category, the distinction between the power it

has ‘with regard to us’, namely humans (3 8 +), versus the power

it has when brought into contact with other organic or inorganic

substances or entities, such as fire;^37

bodily state (

 
) and time (!), that is, whether the state of the


body is simple or complex, and whether the drug works immediately

or after an elapse of some time;^38

(^33) De temper. 3. 1 (p. 91. 6 ff. Helmreich, 1. 654 K.); cf.De simpl. med. fac. 1. 3 ( 11. 385 K.). On this notion
see Harig ( 1974 ) 108 ff., who refers toDe simpl. med. fac. 5. 1 ( 11. 705 K.); 4. 9 ( 11. 650 K.); 5. 17 ( 11. 760
K.); 5. 18 ( 11. 761 – 4 K.).
(^34) De temper. 3. 3 (p. 95. 26 ff. Helmreich, 1. 661 ff. K.).
(^35) De temper. 3. 3 (p. 98. 17 ff. Helmreich, 1. 666 K.); 3. 4 (p. 102. 15 – 16 Helmreich, 1. 672 K.); cf.De comp.
med. per gen. 1. 6 ( 13. 401 K.);De simpl. med. fac. 1. 2 ( 11. 382 K.); 1. 31 ( 11. 435 K.); 3. 4 ( 11. 545 K.).
(^36) De temper. 3. 1 (p. 91. 15 Helmreich, 1. 655 K.); 3. 2 (p. 91. 19 Helmreich, 1. 655 K.); 3. 4 (p. 100. 22 – 4
Helmreich, 1. 670 K.); cf.De alim. facult. 1. 1. 24 – 29 (CMGv4, 2 ,pp. 209. 16 – 211. 3 Helmreich,
6. 467 – 70 K.);De simpl. med. fac. 1. 1 ( 11. 380 K.); 1. 3 ( 11. 385 K.); 3. 3 ( 11. 545 K.); 5. 1 ( 11. 705 K.). On this
distinction, and on the physiological factors determining whether a substance acts as a foodstuff, or
a drug, or a poison, see Harig ( 1974 ) 87 – 95.
(^37) De temper. 3. 5 (p. 109. 14 ff. Helmreich, 1. 684 K.); cf.De simpl. med. fac. 1. 2 ( 11. 382 K.). On this
distinction see Harig ( 1974 ), p. 84 nn. 26 – 7 , who refers toDe simpl. med. fac. 1. 40 ( 11. 455 f. K.); 2. 3
( 11. 467 K.); 2. 20 ( 11. 518 K.); 3. 6 ( 11. 552 K.); 3. 9 ( 11. 557 K.).
(^38) De temper. 3. 5 (p. 111. 24 ff. Helmreich, 1. 688 K.).

Free download pdf