indicate their own value preferences through judicial process.^15 The principle that the Sierra Club
would...us establish in this case would do...that.
[11] As we conclude that the Court of Appeals was correct in its holding, the Sierra Club lacked
standing to contain this action, we do not reach...other questions presented in the pe... and we
intimate no view on the.... It’s of the complaint. The judgement affirmed....
Mr. Justice POWELL and Mr. Justice REHNQUIST took no part in the consideration of
decision of this case.
Mr. Justice DOUGLAS , dissenting.
I share the views of my brother BLACKMUN and would reverse the judgement below.
The critical question of “standing”^16 would be simplified and also put neatly into focus if we
fashioned a federal rule that allowed environmental issues to be litigated before federal agencies
or federal courts in the name of the inanimate object about to be despoiled, defaced, or invaded
by roads and bulldozers and where injury is the subject of public outrage. Contemporary public
concern for protecting nature’s ecological equilibrium should lead to the conferral of standing
upon environmental objects to sue for their own preservation. See, Should Trees Have Standing?
Toward Legal Rights for Natural Objects, 45 S.Cal.L.Rev.450 (1972). This suit would therefore
be more properly labeled as Mineral King v. Morton.
Inanimate objects are sometimes parties in litigation. A ship has a legal personality, a fiction
found useful for maritime purposes.^17 The corporation sole- a creature of ecclesiastical law- is an
(^15) Every school boy may be familiar with...exis deToequeville’s famous observation, written in the 1830’s,
that “scarce-...any political question arises in the United States that is not resolved., sooner, or later, into
judicial question.” 1 Democracy in America280 (1945). Less familiar, however, is De Toequeville’s
further observation that judicial review is effective largely because it is not available simply at the beherest
of a partisan faction, but is exercised only to remedy a particular, concrete injury.
“ It will be seen, also, that by leaving it to the private to censure the law, and by intimately uniting the trial
of the law with the trial of an individual, legislation is protected from wanton assault and from the daily
aggressions of the party spirit. The errors of the legislator are exposed only to meet a real want; and it is
always a positive and appreciable fact that must serve as basis of a prosecution.” Id., at 102.
(^16)
See generally Association of data processing Serving Organizations, Inc. v. Camp, 397 U.S .150,90 S.Ct.
827,25 L.Ed.2d 184 (1970); Barlow v. Collins,397 U.S.159,90,S.Ct.832,25 L.Ed.2d192 (1970); Flast v.
Cohen,392 U.S.83,88 S.Ct.1942, 20 L.Ed.2d 947 (1968).See also Mr.Justice Brennan’s separate opinion in
Barlow v. Collins, supra, 397 U.S., at 167,90 S.C.t., at 838. The issue of statutory standing aside, no doubt
exists that “ injury in fact” to “aesthetic” and “conservational” interests is here sufficiently threatened to
satisfy the cease-or-controversy clause. Association of Data Processing Service Organizations, Inc. v.
Camp, supra, 397 U.S., at 1564, 90 S.Ct., 830.
(^17)
In rem actions brought to adjudicate libelants ‘interests in vessels are well known in admiralty.G.Gilmore
& C. Black, The Law of Admiralty 31 (1957). But admiralty also permits a salvage action to be brought in
the name of rescuing vessel. The Camanche, 8 Wall.448, 476,19 L.Ed. 397 (1869). And, in collision,
Litigation, the first libeled ship may counterclaim in its own name. The Gylfe v. The Trujillo, 209.F2d 386
(CA2 1954). Our case law has personalized vessels:
“A ship is born when she is launched, and lives so long as her identity is preserved. Prior to her launching
she is a mere congeries of wood and iron...In the baptism of launching she receives her name, and from the