Computer Aided Sound System Design 1367
the system, the sensitivity of the transducer , and
the filter configuration of the system:
(35-38)
where,
denotes the angle- and frequency-dependent
directivity ratio.
Correspondingly, the coherent pressure sum of
several components of a system is expressed by:
(35-39)
This formulation relates principally to Eq. 35-6 with the
equalities of and.
The loudspeaker properties and
will normally be measured and the parameters
and are defined by the manufacturer or end
user. As a result, this concept allows one to model the
full response of a multicomponent system under con-
sideration of the given filter settings, may it be a multi-
way loudspeaker or a digitally steered column. Of
course, the effect of changing crossover parameters on
the directivity characteristics can be also calculated.^41
An example is shown in Fig. 35-33.
A second step can now be taken as well. The
mechanical variability of touring line arrays or clusters
can be considered by defining either directly by its
coordinates or indirectly as a function of user-defined
parameters, such as the mounting height of the system
and the splay angles between individual cabinets.
35.2.1.3.4 Shadowing and Ray Tracing
It has been pointed out earlier, that for a large-format
loudspeaker system, the use of a single point as the ori-
gin for ray tracing- or particle-based methods is not ade-
quate. On the other hand, it is not practical to use all
individual acoustic sources as origins for the ray-tracing
process, given available computing power and the geo-
metrical accuracy of the model. But that is not neces-
sary anyway, since the ray tracing algorithm can be run
for subsets or groups of acoustic sources. Therefore rep-
resentative points have to be found, so-called virtual
center points, that can be used as particle sources,
Fig. 35-34.
Typical lower-frequency limits for the particle model
and the level of detail in common room models suggest
ray tracing sources to be spaced apart by about 0.5 to
1 m. In many cases this corresponds to one ray tracing
origin per loudspeaker cabinet. While this method of
virtual center points is significantly more accurate than
using a single source of rays for the whole array, it is
still viable with respect to the required computational
performance.
35.2.1.3.5 Additional Notes
Some other problems are also automatically resolved by
modeling the components of a loudspeaker system sepa-
rately. For example, the definition of maximum power
handling capabilities becomes straightforward. Each
component can be described individually by its maxi-
mum input level and possibly the frequency response of
the test signal. In this respect also the focus of the pro-
audio community increasingly shifts from sometimes
obscure maximum power values, as defined by the loud-
speaker manufacturer, toward the specification of maxi-
mum voltage as the entity that is directly measured and
applied in modern constant voltage amplifiers.
Finally, one should be aware of the errors made in
advanced modeling approaches like the GLL or DLL. It
is clear that the acquisition of complex data requires
more care and thus engineers will initially see signifi-
Figure 35-32. Comparison of measurement and prediction
for the LF–LF configuration of two two-way loudspeakers,
measured data at 5q angular resolution (+), complex data
at 5q angular resolution (dashed) and complex data (solid)
at 2.5q angular resolution, at 1 kHz and -octave band-
width.
10
20
30
40
30
210
60
240
90
270
120
300
150
330
(^1800)
(^1) » 3
K f
hf
AM-M-f = Kf f hf Uf
M- f
pSum rf
*nKM-f n f hn fUn f
rr– n
-------------------------------------------------------------------------exp>@–jkn rr– n
n
¦
=
EKaKn f hn f PUa n f^2
*n M-f Kn f
hn f
*n f
rn,