Consoles 883
A minor failing with this simple circuit is that at high
frequencies a parallel impedance (consisting of the vari-
able resistor and capacitor chain) hangs directly from
the terminal to ground. Buffering the chain from the
terminal by a follower eliminates this, Fig. 25-63C.
Fig. 25-63A creates an analog of an inductor with
the losses shown in Fig. 25-63B. The series resistor is
the 150: bootstrap resistor; after all, a proper inductive
reactance tends to zero at low frequencies, not 150:.
The resistor is in series with the faked inductance
tending to make it seem somewhat lossy or have a lower
Q than a perfect inductor. If a fake inductor can be said
to have winding resistance, this is it! The R/C network
across the lot represents, again, the high-pass filter
impedance, which on the addition of the follower disap-
pears to be replaced in Fig. 25-63D by the much greater
input impedance of the follower, which is high enough
to be discounted.
As a short footnote to this gyrator epic, consider what
happens to either Fig. 25-63C or F if the high-pass resis-
tance-capacitance filter is replaced by a low-pass filter
by swapping R with C. It may seem a bit strange to use
circuitry to imitate a capacitor, but imitating a continu-
ously variable capacitor does make sense. Real variable
capacitors of the large values needed in EQs (yet easily
created by gyrators) simply don’t exist otherwise.
25.11.12 Constant-Amplitude Phase-Shift Network
A constant-amplitude phase-shift (CAPS) circuit of
previously little real worth (other than for very short
time delays) is shown in Fig. 25-63E. Bearing more
than a little resemblance to a differential amplifier, this
circuit can rotate the output phase through 180° with
respect to the input, around the frequency primarily
determined by the high-pass RC filter. Additionally the
input and output amplitude relationship remains
constant throughout.
How? This is dealt with in Figs. 25-63G and H where
the simplistic assumptions that a capacitor is open
circuit at low frequencies and a short at high frequencies
show that at low frequencies the circuit operates as a
straightforward unity-gain inverting amplifier (180°
phase shift), while at high frequencies it operates as a
unity-gain noninverting amplifier (0° shift). The mecha-
nism for the latter mode is interesting. The op-amp is
actually operating at gain-of-two noninverting; this is
compensated for by the input leg also passing through
the still operating unity inverting path, which naturally
subtracts to leave unity gain, noninverting.
25.11.13 Simulated Resonance
Detailed up to here are all the variables needed to create
single- and second-order filters. Higher-order networks
can be made with combinations of the two. Tracking
variable capacitors and inductors allows the design of
consistent Q bandpass filters irrespective of frequency.
This eventually leads to a dawning of understanding in
how the much-touted integrator-loop filters such as the
state variable actually operate. The clue lies with the
180° phase-shift circuit of Fig. 25-63E. Connecting two
such filters (with the variable resistor elements ganged)
in series produces a remarkably performing circuit. At
any frequency within the design swing, it is possible for
the circuit output voltage to be exactly out of phase with
the source 180° phase shift). By summing input and
output, direct cancellation at that frequency and at no
other is achieved. In short, a variable-frequency notch
filter with a consistent resonant characteristic results.
Alternatively, bootstrapping the input from the output
actually changes that input port into something that
behaves exactly like a series-tuned circuit to ground, Fig.
25-63J. The circuit is continuously variable in frequency
with a consistent Q by virtue of the simultaneously
tracking simulated inductor and capacitor maintaining
exactly the same elemental reactances at whatever the
selected operating resonant frequency. This creates the
same source resistance, same reactance, same Q.
25.11.14 Consistent Q and Constant Bandwidth
The same Q definitely does not imply the same filter
bandwidth. As the resonant frequency changes, the
bandwidth changes proportionally. Bandwidth is, after
all, the ratio of frequency to Q. Some active filters, such
as the multifeedback variety, exhibit a constant band-
width when the resonant frequency is changed: a 10:1
variation of center frequency, a 10:1 variation of Q.
This, of course, is rarely useful for real EQ; it is note-
worthy though in that the change in Q with frequency
happens in the opposite sense to that expected from a
normal variable tuned circuit. The Q sharpens with
increasing frequency. It is a perfect example of a
constant-bandwidth filter.
25.11.15 Q, EQ, and Music
The near insistence on resonant-type filters being
constant in Q when varied in frequency is not through
an industrywide collective lack of imagination or desire
to keep things tidy. It stems from psychoacoustics, from