which in the Schr ̈odinger representation is the differential equation
(Q−τP)ψ(q) =
(
q+iτ
d
dq
)
ψ(q) = 0
which has solutions
ψ(q)∝ei
τ
2 |τ|^2 q
2
(26.20)
This will be a normalizable state for Im(τ)>0, again showing the necessity of
the positivity condition.
Eigenstates ofHτforτ =ic,c >0 real, are known as “squeezed states”
in physics. By equation 26.20 the lowest energy state| 0 〉will have spatial
dependence proportional to
e−
21 cq^2
and higher energy eigenstates|n〉will also have such a Gaussian factor in their
position dependence. Forc <1 such states will have narrower spatial width
than conventional quanta (thus the name “squeezed”), but wider width in mo-
mentum space. Forc >1 the opposite will be true. In some sense that we
won’t try to make precise, the limits asc→ ∞andc→0 correspond to the
Schr ̈odinger representations in position and momentum space respectively (with
the distinguished Bargmann-Fock state| 0 〉approaching the constant function
in position or momentum space).
The subgroupR⊂SL(2,R) of equation 24.7 acts non-trivially onJ 0 , by
J 0 =
(
0 1
−1 0
)
→
(
er 0
0 e−r
)(
0 1
−1 0
)(
e−r 0
0 er
)
=
(
0 e^2 r
−e−^2 r 0
)
takingJ 0 to the complex structure with parameterτ=ie^2 r.
Recall from section 24.4 that changing fromq,pcoordinates toz,zcoordi-
nates on the complexified phase space, the groupSL(2,R) becomes the isomor-
phic groupSU(1,1), the group of matrices
(
α β
β α
)
satisfying
|α|^2 −|β|^2 = 1
Looking at equation 24.11 that gives the conjugation relating the two groups,
we see that (
−i 0
0 i
)
∈SU(1,1)↔
(
0 1
−1 0
)
∈SL(2,R)
and as expected, in these coordinatesJ 0 acts onzby multiplication byi, onz
by multiplication by−i.
SU(1,1) matrices can be parametrized in terms oft,θ,θ′by taking
α=eiθ
′
cosht, β=eiθsinht