31.1.1 Quantization of the pseudo-classical spin
As an example, one can consider the quantization of the pseudo-classical spin
degree of freedom of section 30.3.1. In that case Γ+takes values in Cliff(3, 0 ,R),
for which an explicit identification with the algebraM(2,C) of two by two
complex matrices was given in section 28.2. One has
Γ+(ξj) =
1
√
2
γj=
1
√
2
σj
and the Hamiltonian operator is
−iH= Γ+(h) =Γ+(B 12 ξ 1 ξ 2 +B 13 ξ 1 ξ 3 +B 23 ξ 2 ξ 3 )
=
1
2
(B 12 σ 1 σ 2 +B 13 σ 1 σ 3 +B 23 σ 2 σ 3 )
=i
1
2
(B 1 σ 1 +B 2 σ 2 +B 3 σ 3 )
This is nothing but our old example from chapter 7 of a fixed spin particle in a
magnetic field.
The pseudo-classical equation of motion
d
dt
ξj(t) =−{h,ξj}+
after quantization becomes the Heisenberg picture equation of motion for the
spin operators (see equation 7.3)
d
dt
SH(t) =−i[SH·B,SH]
for the case of Hamiltonian
H=−μ·B
(see equation 7.2) and magnetic moment operator
μ=S
Here the state space isH=C^2 , with an explicit choice of basis given by our
chosen identification of Cliff(3, 0 ,R) with two by two complex matrices. In the
next sections we will consider the case of an even dimensional fermionic phase
space, but there provide a basis-independent construction of the state space and
the action of the Clifford algebra on it.
31.2 The Schr ̈odinger representation for fermions: ghosts
We would like to construct representations of Cliff(r,s,R) and thus fermionic
state spaces by using analogous constructions to the Schr ̈odinger and Bargmann-
Fock ones in the bosonic case. The Schr ̈odinger construction took the state