is the Hamiltonian for the classical fermionic oscillator. Quantizingh(see equa-
tion 31.4) will give (−i) times the Hamiltonian operator
−iH=−
i
2
∑d
j=1
(aF†jaFj−aFjaF†j) =−i
∑d
j=1
(
aF†jaFj−
1
2
)
and a Lie algebra representation ofu(1) with half-integral eigenvalues (±i^12 ).
Exponentiation will give a representation of a double cover ofU(1)⊂U(d).
Quantizinghinstead using normal ordering gives
:−iH: =−i
∑d
j=1
aF†jaFj
and a true representation ofU(1)⊂U(d), with
UA′ =iφ
∑d
j=1
aF†jaFj
satisfying
[UA′,a†F] =iφa†F, [UA′,aF] =−iφaF
Exponentiating, the action on annihilation and creation operators is
e−iφ
∑d
j=1aF
†
jaFja†Feiφ
∑d
j=1aF
†
jaFj=eiφa†F
e−iφ
∑d
j=1aF†jaFjaFeiφ
∑d
j=1aF†jaFj=e−iφaF
31.5 An example: spinors forSO(4)
We saw in chapter 6 that the spin groupSpin(4) was isomorphic toSp(1)×
Sp(1) =SU(2)×SU(2). Its action onR^4 was then given by identifyingR^4 =H
and acting by unit quaternions on the left and the right (thus the two copies of
Sp(1)). While this constructs the representation ofSpin(4) onR^4 , it does not
provide the spin representation ofSpin(4).
A conventional way of defining the spin representation is to choose an explicit
matrix representation of the Clifford algebra (in this case Cliff(4, 0 ,R)), for
instance
γ 0 =
(
0 1
1 0
)
,γ 1 =−i
(
0 σ 1
−σ 1 0
)
,γ 2 =−i
(
0 σ 2
−σ 2 0
)
,γ 3 =−i
(
0 σ 3
−σ 3 0
)
where we have written the matrices in 2 by 2 block form, and are indexing the
four dimensions from 0 to 3. One can easily check that these satisfy the Clifford
algebra relations: they anticommute with each other and
γ 02 =γ^21 =γ 22 =γ^23 = 1